Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37326364›Full record

ArticleWomen's health (London, England)

Urinary incontinence in women 55 years and older: A scoping review to understand prevalence, incidence, and mortality of urinary incontinence during secondary care admission.

Isobel McMillan, Lyndsay Hill, Robyn McCarthy, Ruth Haas-Eckersley, Margaret Russell, Julie Wood, Liz Doxford-Hook, Yu Fu, Linda McGowan, Heather Iles-Smith

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Isobel McMillanSchool of Health and Society, The University of Salford, Salford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1233-2198
Lyndsay HillSchool of Health and Society, The University of Salford, Salford, UK.
Robyn McCarthySchool of Health and Society, The University of Salford, Salford, UK.
Ruth Haas-EckersleySalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0506-9985
Margaret RussellSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
Julie WoodSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
Liz Doxford-HookLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Yu FuNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Linda McGowanThe University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Heather Iles-SmithSchool of Health and Society, The University of Salford, Salford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0520-2694
University of Salford · GBSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBNewcastle University · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUp to 40% of older women living in the community experience urinary incontinence. In community settings, urinary incontinence impacts the quality of life, morbidity, and mortality rates. However, little is known about urinary incontinence and its impact on older women admitted to hospitals.

objectivesThis scoping review aims to establish the current knowledge of urinary incontinence during hospital admission for women (⩾ 55 years of age) with three key objectives: (a) What is the prevalence/incidence of urinary incontinence? (b) What health conditions are associated with urinary incontinence? (c) Is there an association between urinary incontinence and mortality? ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Empirical studies were included in assessing the incidence/prevalence of urinary incontinence during hospital admissions and its related morbidities and mortality rates. Studies which only included men or younger women (< 55 years of age) were excluded. Only articles written in English and conducted between 2015 and 2021 were included. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: A search strategy was developed, and CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases were searched. CHARTING

methodsData from each article meeting the criteria were pulled into a table, including study design, study population, and setting, aims, methods, outcome measures, and significant findings. A second researcher then reviewed the populated data extraction table.

resultsOverall, 383 papers were found: 7 met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Prevalence rates ranged from 22% to 80% depending on the study cohort. Several conditions were associated with urinary incontinence, including frailty, orthopaedics, stroke, palliative care, neurology, and cardiology. There was a potential positive association between mortality and urinary incontinence, although only two papers reviewed reported mortality.

conclusionA dearth of literature determined the prevalence, incidence, and mortality rates for older women admitted to hospitals. Limited consensus on associated conditions was found. Further research is needed to fully explore urinary incontinence in older women during hospital admissions, particularly concerning prevalence/incidence and its association with mortality.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSecondary Health CareUrinary IncontinenceAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedPrevalencehospital admissionincontinence of urinemortalityolder womenprevalencescoping review

Identifiers

PMID37326364
PMCPMC10278415
OpenAlexW4380870466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.