Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37325954›Full record

ReviewThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2023

Nutritional Interventions: Dietary Protein Needs and Influences on Skeletal Muscle of Older Adults.

Wayne W Campbell, Nicolaas E P Deutz, Elena Volpi, Caroline M Apovian

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Wayne W CampbellDepartment of Nutrition Science, Center on Aging and the Life Course, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9294-1056
Nicolaas E P DeutzCenter for Translational Research in Aging and Longevity, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5845-6447
Elena VolpiSealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8776-0384
Caroline M ApovianDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USPurdue University West Lafayette · USTexas A&M University · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

NIA NIH HHSNIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis narrative review describes foundational and emerging evidence of how dietary protein intakes may influence muscle-related attributes of older adults.

methodsPubMed was used to identify pertinent research.

resultsAmong medically stable older adults, protein intakes below the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) (0.8 g/kg body weight [BW]/d) exacerbate age-related reductions in muscle size, quality, and function. Dietary patterns with total protein intakes at or moderately above the RDA, including one or preferably more meals containing sufficient dietary protein to maximize protein anabolism, promote muscle size and function. Some observational studies suggest protein intakes from 1.0 to 1.6 g/kg BW/d may promote greater muscle strength and function more so than muscle size. Experimental findings from randomized controlled feeding trials indicate protein intakes greater than the RDA (averaging ~1.3 g/kg BW/d) do not influence indices of lean body mass or muscle and physical functions with non-stressed conditions, but positively influence changes in lean body mass with purposeful catabolic (energy restriction) or anabolic (resistance exercise training) stressors. Among older adults with diagnosed medical conditions or acute illness, specialized protein or amino acid supplements that stimulate muscle protein synthesis and improve protein nutritional status may attenuate the loss of muscle mass and function and improve survival of malnourished patients. Observational studies favor animal versus plant protein sources for sarcopenia-related parameters.

conclusionsQuantity, quality, and patterning of dietary protein consumed by older adults with varied metabolic states, and hormonal and health status influence the nutritional needs and therapeutic use of protein to support muscle size and function.

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalSarcopeniaBody CompositionDietary ProteinsDietary SupplementsHumansMuscle StrengthNutritional StatusDietary ProteinsAnimal protein foodsAppendicular lean massDietary protein distributionMuscle protein synthesisPhysical function

Identifiers

PMID37325954
PMCPMC10272976
OpenAlexW4380869412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.