ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023
Repeatability and comparison of 2D and 4D flow MRI measurement of intracranial blood flow and pulsatility in healthy individuals and patients with cerebral small vessel disease.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-time phase-contrast MRI can be used to quantify cerebrovascular reserve capacity - a comparative study to neurovascular ultrasound in healthy subjects.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Lateralized cerebral arterial blood flow and blood pressure adaptations to short-term head-down tilt: a 4D flow MRI study with cognitive function assessment.Military Medical Research · 2026Article
- Quantifying physiological variability and improving reproducibility in 4D-flow MRI cerebrovascular measurements with self-supervised deep learning.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Repeatability and reproducibility of hemodynamic measurements by intracranial 4D Flow MRI: a multi‑vendor and multi‑software cross‑over comparison study.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Synchronous quantification of arterial, venous, and cerebrospinal fluid flow dynamics using real-time phase-contrast MRI.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2025Article
- Assessment of Gait Disorders in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: Advantages of Different Clinical Scales.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Feasibility and reliability of high-resolution phase-contrast quantitative-flow magnetic resonance imaging for assessing femoral head blood flow: a prospective study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Simultaneous and synchronous characterization of blood and CSF flow dynamics using multiple Venc PC MRI.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Reliability of 4D Flow MRI for Investigation of Fetal Cardiovascular Hemodynamics in the Third Trimester.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2024Article
- Incident Infarcts in Patients With Stroke and Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: Frequency and Relation to Clinical Outcomes.Neurology · 2024Article
- Measuring global cerebrovascular pulsatility transmission using 4D flow MRI.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Observation of intracranial artery and venous sinus hemodynamics using compressed sensing-accelerated 4D flow MRI: performance at different acceleration factors.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: While 2D phase-contrast MRI is often used to examine intracranial vessels in neurovascular disease contexts, the ability of 4D flow to assess many vessels at once makes it an attractive alternative. We aimed to assess the repeatability, reliability, and conformity of 2D and 4D flow across intracranial vessels. Methods: Using correlation analyses and paired Results: Repeatability for PI measurements was mostly classed as good using both 2D (median ICC = 0.765) and 4D (0.772) methods, and for mean flow was mostly moderate across both (2D: 0.711, 4D: 0.571). 4D reliability was good for PI (0.877-0.906) and moderate for mean flow (0.459-0.723). Arterial PI measurements were generally higher using the 2D method, while mean flow was mostly higher using 4D flow. Discussion: These results imply that PI measurement using 4D flow is repeatable and reliable across intracranial arteries and veins, but care should be paid to absolute flow measurements as they are susceptible to variation depending on slice placement, resolution, and lumen segmentation practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.