Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37325714›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2023

Reasons to not correct for leaching in TBI; Reply to Lind et al. (2022).

Judith M Sarneel, Janna M Barel, Sarah Duddigan, Joost A Keuskamp, Ada Pastor, Taru Sandén, Gesche Blume-Werry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Judith M SarneelDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Science Umeå University Umeå Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6187-499X
Janna M BarelAquatic Ecology & Environmental Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences Radboud University Nijmegen Nijmegen The Netherlands.
Sarah DuddiganSoil Research Centre and Department of Geography & Environmental Science University of Reading Reading UK.
Joost A KeuskampEcology & Biodiversity Group, Institute of Environmental Biology Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.
Ada PastorGRECO, Institute of Aquatic Ecology University of Girona Girona Spain.
Taru SandénDepartment for Soil Health and Plant Nutrition Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety (AGES) Vienna Austria.
Gesche Blume-WerryDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Science Umeå University Umeå Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0909-670X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We believe that correcting for leaching in (terrestrial) litterbags studies such as the Tea Bag Index will result in more uncertainties than it resolves. This is mainly because leaching occurs in pulses upon changes in the environment and because leached material can still be mineralized after leaching. Furthermore, amount of material that potentially leaches from tea is comparable to other litter types. When correcting for leaching, it is key to be specific about the employed method, just like being specific about the study specific definition of decomposition.

Identifiers

PMID37325714
PMCPMC10262069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.