SynthesisFrontiers in public health2023
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of 24 antibiotics for group A streptococcal pharyngitis: a network meta-analysis of 64 randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Genomic epidemiology and molecular characterization ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Comparing virulence profile of dominantInfectious diseases & immunity · 2026Article
- Emergence of distinct Streptococcus pyogenes emm1 and emm12 lineages in China.Nature microbiology · 2026Article
- Molecular Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Article
- Ongoing epidemic of scarlet fever in Shanghai and the emergence of M1The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Article
- Immunization with the M12-N, M12-C, and M12-N+C fusion peptides derived from the M12 protein elicited varying levels of protective immune responses against multiple serotypes of group AFrontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The recent increase of group A Methods: We collected studies reporting GAS Results: 47 high quality studies were included for a systematic analysis of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.