ReviewCritical care research and practice2023
MRI and the Critical Care Patient: Clinical, Operational, and Financial Challenges.
Review in Critical care research and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systemic review of facial expression recognition (FER) in stroke: diagnosis and emerging applications in rehabilitation.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Non-contrast computed tomography at the end of the acute care phase as an additional prognostic tool after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- A speech-to-video synthesis approach using spatio-temporal diffusion for vocal tract MRI.Medical image analysis · 2026Article
- The changing spectrum of neurointensive care unit needs for tumor patients.Neuro-oncology advances · 2026Review
- Experience with new technology: Point-of-care magnetic resonance imaging in the neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2026Article
- The role of neuroimaging in neurotoxicity after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Review
- Observational
- Hollow CuS nanocubes enhance serum metabolic profiles for rapid diagnosis and severity grading of traumatic brain injury.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Portable Bedside Low-Field MRI for Assessment of Ventricular Size.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Dual-Layer Spectral CT with Electron Density in Bone Marrow Edema Diagnosis: A Valid Alternative to MRI?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Neuroimaging for prognosis of central nervous system infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of intensive care · 2025Article
- Article
- Early alterations of thalami- and hippocampi-cortical functional connectivity as biomarkers of seizures after traumatic brain injury.Neuroimage. Reports · 2024Article
- Applications, limitations and advancements of ultra-low-field magnetic resonance imaging: A scoping review.Surgical neurology international · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroimaging in conjunction with a neurologic examination has become a valuable resource for today's intensive care unit (ICU) physicians. Imaging provides critical information during the assessment and ongoing neuromonitoring of patients for toxic-metabolic or structural injury of the brain. A patient's condition can change rapidly, and interventions may require imaging. When making this determination, the benefit must be weighed against possible risks associated with intrahospital transport. The patient's condition is assessed to decide if they are stable enough to leave the ICU for an extended period. Intrahospital transport risks include adverse events related to the physical nature of the transport, the change in the environment, or relocating equipment used to monitor the patient. Adverse events can be categorized as minor (e.g., clinical decompensation) or major (e.g., requiring immediate intervention) and may occur in preparation or during transport. Regardless of the type of event experienced, any intervention during transport impacts the patient and may lead to delayed treatment and disruption of critical care. This review summarizes the commentary on the current literature on the associated risks and provides insight into the costs as well as provider experiences. Approximately, one-third of patients who are transported from the ICU to an imaging suite may experience an adverse event. This creates an additional risk for extending a patient's stay in the ICU. The delay in obtaining imaging can negatively impact the patient's treatment plan and affect long-term outcomes as increased disability or mortality. Disruption of ICU therapy can decrease respiratory function after the patient returns from transport. Because of the complex care team needed for patient transport, the staff time alone can cost $200 or more. New technologies and advancements are needed to reduce patient risk and improve safety.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.