Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37325199›Full record

ArticleBiochar2023

Biochar application to temperate grasslands: challenges and opportunities for delivering multiple ecosystem services.

Robert W Brown, David R Chadwick, Tom Bott, Helen M West, Paul Wilson, Genevieve R Hodgins, Colin E Snape, Davey L Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochar, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robert W BrownSchool of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, LL57 2UW Gwynedd UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9119-6130
David R ChadwickSchool of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, LL57 2UW Gwynedd UK.
Tom BottSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, LE12 5RD UK.
Helen M WestSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, LE12 5RD UK.
Paul WilsonSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, LE12 5RD UK.
Genevieve R HodginsDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Nottingham, Jubilee Campus, Nottingham, NG7 2TU UK.
Colin E SnapeDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Nottingham, Jubilee Campus, Nottingham, NG7 2TU UK.
Davey L JonesSchool of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, LL57 2UW Gwynedd UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grasslands (natural, semi-natural and improved) occupy approximately one-third of the terrestrial biosphere and are key for global ecosystem service provision, storing up to 30% of soil organic carbon (SOC). To date, most research on soil carbon (C) sequestration has focused on croplands where the levels of native soil organic matter (SOM) are typically low and significant potential exists to replenish SOM stocks. However, with the renewed push to achieve "net zero" C emissions by 2050, grasslands may offer an additional C store, utilising tools such as biochar. Here, we critically evaluate the potential for biochar as a technology for increasing grassland C stocks, identifying a number of practical, economic, social and legislative challenges that need to be addressed before the widescale adoption of biochar may be achieved. We critically assess the current knowledge within the field of grassland biochar research in the context of ecosystem service provision and provide opinions on the applicability of biochar as an amendment to different types of grassland (improved, semi-improved and unimproved) and the potential effect on ecosystem provision using a range of application techniques in the topsoil and subsoil. We concluded that the key question remains, is it possible for managed grasslands to store more C, without causing a loss in additional ecosystem services? To address this question future research must take a more multidisciplinary and holistic approach when evaluating the potential role of biochar at sequestering C in grasslands to mitigate climate change. Graphical Abstract: Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42773-023-00232-y.

Indexed as

Carbon storageGreenhouse gas emissionsOffsettingPastureland

Identifiers

PMID37325199
PMCPMC10261193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.