ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2023
Exploring professionals' practices and perspectives on supporting parents with intellectual disabilities: a qualitative study.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Evidence suggests that parents with intellectual disabilities require appropriate parenting support. However, professional practices vary widely, and several barriers and challenges persist in supporting parents with intellectual disabilities. To identify effective and collaborative practices, this study investigated practices reported by professionals and their roles in providing services to parents with intellectual disabilities. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 professionals from three sectors (disability, early childhood, and healthcare), and the content was analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Thematic analyses yielded four main themes: (1) Perceived professional practices, (2) professional stances, (3) the frame of reference and the ethics of support, (4) the experience of providing support. They are described in terms of content and distribution across sectors to provide an overview of practices as well as potential discrepancies. Conclusions: This study concludes by developing recommendations on good practices for support professionals to respond as adequately as possible to meet the needs of parents and future parents with intellectual disabilities, which include structural support and guidelines for professionals to provide sensitive, family-centred, and enabling support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.