Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37325125›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2023

COVID-19 Vaccine Perspective Among University Lecturers and Students: A Qualitative Study of Pre Implementation of Vaccination.

Laili Rahayuwati, Kuswandewi Mutyara, Ryan Rachmad Nugraha, Madan Khatiwada, Carine Dochez, Cissy Kartasasmita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laili RahayuwatiDepartment of Community Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, 45363, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-2732-3534
Kuswandewi MutyaraDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung, 45363, Indonesia.
Ryan Rachmad NugrahaUSAID Health Financing Activity/ThinkWell, Jakarta, 10110, Indonesia.
Madan KhatiwadaNetwork for Education and Support in Immunisation (NESI), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, 2610, Belgium.
Carine DochezNetwork for Education and Support in Immunisation (NESI), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, 2610, Belgium.
Cissy KartasasmitaDepartment of Pediatric, Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung, 40161, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The determinants of vaccine preferences and hesitancy varied by time and place. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the perspective of a COVID-19 vaccine among university-based groups. Methodology: This qualitative research involved lecturers and students, and a selection of online focused group discussion was conducted based on the following criteria, including representatives of the health and non-health faculties, with at least 8 attendees in lecturer groups, and 8 participants in student groups. Results: This study is described in 8 themes covering various issues about COVID-19 vaccine, such as views on COVID-19 vaccine, fake news, vaccine implementation by government. Conclusion: The assessment of vaccine perspective shows that although awaited by some people, it also creates contradictions. This is due to the massive amount of information available regarding the vaccine descriptions. The role of the government as the main policy maker is to provide the right information and to make the right decisions about vaccines and vaccination implementation.

Indexed as

acceptanceCOVID-19hesitancyvaccine

Identifiers

PMID37325125
PMCPMC10266379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.