ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2014
Application of a Mixed Methods Approach to Identify Community-Level Solutions to Decrease Racial Disparities in Infant Mortality.
Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to identify community-level actions to decrease racial disparities in infant mortality (IM). Design: Six urban multidisciplinary teams generated ideas for decreasing racial disparities in IM using a mixed methods concept mapping approach. Participants rated each idea as to its necessity and action potential and grouped ideas by theme. A cluster analysis produced a series of visual representations, showing relationships between the identified actions and the clustering of actions into themes. Multidimensional scaling techniques were used to produce analyses describing the necessity of and action potential for implementing the proposed ideas. Participants identified actions communities could take to decrease racial disparities in IM and suggested applications of the knowledge gained from the mapping process. Results: Participants produced a total of 128 actions, within 11 thematic clusters, for decreasing racial disparities in IM. The thematic clusters contained a range of elements designed to promote knowledge and understanding of the relationship between health and racism; improve educational systems and community opportunities; facilitate community-driven health promotion, marketing, and research; improve health services for women; address physical and social environments that impact community health; prioritize resource allocation of community-based services; institutionalize strategies that promote equity across all systems; and create and support legislation and policies that address social determinants of health. Correlation coefficients of the clusters ranged from 0.17 to 0.90. Average necessity ratings ranged from 2.17 to 3.73; average action potential ratings ranged from 1.64 to 3.61. Conclusion: Findings suggest that thematic clusters with high action potential usually represented ongoing community activities or actions communities could easily initiate. Community size, existing programs, partnerships, policies, and influential advocates were among the factors cited affecting feasibility of implementation. Clusters with lower action potential require broader, longer term, policy, institutional or system-wide changes, and significant resources. High necessity clusters often contained actions perceived as essential for change, but sometimes outside of a community's control. Participants identified a number of practical actions that were considered to hold potential for individual, community, and institutional changes which could result in decreasing racial disparities in IM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.