Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37324908›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2023

Application of different proportions of sweet sorghum silage as a substitute for corn silage in dairy cows.

Xiaokang Lv, Liang Chen, Chuanshe Zhou, Guijie Zhang, Jingjing Xie, Jinhe Kang, Zhiliang Tan, Shaoxun Tang, Zhiwei Kong, Zixin Liu and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dietary Sweet Sorghum (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaokang LvCAS Key Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Physiology and Metabolic Process Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences Changsha Hunan 410125 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4744-4683
Liang ChenResearch Institute of Rural Revitalization Strategy Shenyang Agricultural University Shenyang Liaoning 110866 China.
Chuanshe ZhouCAS Key Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Physiology and Metabolic Process Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences Changsha Hunan 410125 China.
Guijie ZhangSchool of Agriculture Ningxia University Yinchuan Ningxia 750021 China.
Jingjing XieCAS Key Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Physiology and Metabolic Process Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences Changsha Hunan 410125 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9083-1259
Jinhe KangCAS Key Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Physiology and Metabolic Process Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences Changsha Hunan 410125 China.
Zhiliang TanCAS Key Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Physiology and Metabolic Process Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences Changsha Hunan 410125 China.
Shaoxun TangCAS Key Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Physiology and Metabolic Process Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences Changsha Hunan 410125 China.
Zhiwei KongCAS Key Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Physiology and Metabolic Process Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences Changsha Hunan 410125 China.
Zixin LiuCAS Key Laboratory for Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Physiology and Metabolic Process Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences Changsha Hunan 410125 China.
Zhiyan DuHunan Longping Hi-Tech Cultivated and Restoration Technology Co., Ltd Changsha Hunan 410125 China.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNDepartment of Science and Technology of Hunan Province · CNNingxia University · CNShenyang Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This experiment explored the effects of different proportions of sweet sorghum silage as a substitute for corn silage on dry matter intake (DMI), milk yield, milk quality, apparent digestibility, rumen fermentation parameters, serum amino acid profile, and rumen microbial composition of dairy cows. A total of 32 mid-lactation Holstein dairy cows with similar body weights and parities were randomly divided into four treatments: 100% corn silage +0% sorghum silage (CON), 75% corn silage +25% sorghum silage (CS1), 50% corn silage +50% sorghum silage (CS2), and 25% corn silage +75% sorghum silage (CS3). The milk yield was increased (linear,

Indexed as

corn silagedairy cowssweet sorghum silage

Identifiers

PMID37324908
PMCPMC10261775
OpenAlexW4380869797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.