Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37324823›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Psychometric evaluation of PHQ-9 and GAD-7 among community health volunteers and nurses/midwives in Kenya following a nation-wide telephonic survey.

Sabina Adhiambo Odero, Paul Mwangi, Rachel Odhiambo, Brenda Mumbua Nzioka, Constance Shumba, Eunice Ndirangu-Mugo, Amina Abubakar

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. ORIGINAL RESEARCH.Discover mental health · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sabina Adhiambo OderoInstitute for Human Development, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Paul MwangiInstitute for Human Development, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Rachel OdhiamboInstitute for Human Development, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Brenda Mumbua NziokaInstitute for Human Development, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Constance ShumbaSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Eunice Ndirangu-MugoSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Amina AbubakarInstitute for Human Development, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Aga Khan University Nairobi · KE

Funding

UZIMA-DS: UtiliZing health Information for Meaningful Impact in East Africa through Data ScienceU54TW012089 · FIC · AGA KHAN UNIVERSITY (KENYA) · PI Amina Abubakar Ali, Akbar K Waljee · 2021 to 2026
$7.7M
FIC NIH HHS U54 TW012089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nurses/midwives and Community Health Volunteers (CHVs) are exposed to chronic stressors putting them at risk of developing mental health problems. This has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. There is limited empirical evidence of the burden of mental health problems among health care workers partly due to the lack of adequately standardized and validated measures for use among health care workers in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed to perform the psychometric evaluation of the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 administered to nurses/midwives and CHVs across 47 counties in Kenya. Methods: Between June and November 2021, a national survey on mental well-being and resilience among nurses/midwives and CHVs was conducted via telephone interviews. The survey had a total sample size of 1907 nurses/midwives and 2027 CHVs. Cronbach's alpha and MacDonalds' omega were used to evaluate the scale's internal consistency. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was used to test the one-factor structure of the scales. Multi-group CFA was applied to evaluate the generalizability of the scales across the Swahili and English versions, and among male and female health workers. The Spearman correlation was used to assess the tools' divergent and convergent validity. Results: The internal consistency of PHQ-9 and GAD-7 was good, with alpha and omega values above 0.7 across study samples. CFA results indicated a one-factor structure of the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 for both nurses/midwives and CHVs. Multi-group CFA showed that both scales were unidimensional across both language and sex. The PHQ-9 and GAD-7 were significantly negatively correlated with resilience and work engagement, supporting divergent validity. The PHQ-9 and GAD-7 were also significantly positively correlated with resilience and work engagement, supporting divergent validity. Conclusion: The PHQ-9 and GAD-7 are unidimensional, reliable, and valid tools for screening depression and anxiety among nurses/midwives and CHVs. The tools can be administered in a similar population or study setting using either Swahili or English.

Indexed as

anxietycommunity health volunteersdepressionGAD-7nurses/midwivesPHQ-9reliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID37324823
PMCPMC10264862
OpenAlexW4378907737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.