ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2023
The efficacy of detecting arrhythmia is higher with 7-day continuous electrocardiographic patch monitoring than with 24-h Holter monitoring.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Usability and acceptability of ambulatory monitoring in undiagnosed syncope: insights from the ASPIRED-Q qualitative study.BMJ open · 2025Trial
- Wearable ECG patch monitoring for 72 h is comparable to conventional Holter monitoring for 24 h to detect cardiogenic vertigo.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Seven-day ECG Holter vs. 14-day event Holter in the detection of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, new atrial fibrillation, and silent ischemia among heart failure patients from social exclusion regions.Cardiology journal · 2026Article
- Observational
- Detection of Atrial Fibrillation Using Multi-Site Ballistocardiogram with Piezoelectric Rubber Sheet Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Palpitations: A Practical Approach.Cureus · 2025Review
- A Patch-Type Electrocardiography Is Superior to Holter Monitoring for Detecting Paroxysmal Cardiac Arrhythmias.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
- Feasibility and Safety of Early Cardiac Rehabilitation Using Remote Electrocardiogram Monitoring in Patients with Cardiac Surgery: A Pilot Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Wearable Devices for Arrhythmia Detection: Advancements and Clinical Implications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Case report: orthodromic atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia with left lateral accessory pathway-smart diagnosis with a smart device.European heart journal. Case reports · 2025Article
- Clinical applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in neurocardiology: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Comparison of Novel Telemonitoring System Using the Single-lead Electrocardiogram Patch With Conventional Telemetry System.Korean circulation journal · 2024Article
- Telehealth Follow-up Using a Real-Time Electrocardiogram Device Improves Electrocardiogram Monitoring Duration and Patient Satisfaction After Catheter Ablation.Circulation reports · 2023Article
- How to demonstrate clinical implication of 7-day continuous electrocardiographic patch monitoring.Journal of arrhythmia · 2023Article
- The efficacy of detecting arrhythmia is higher with 7-day continuous electrocardiographic patch monitoring than with 24-h Holter monitoring.Journal of arrhythmia · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Detecting high-risk arrhythmia is important in diagnosing patients with palpitations. We compared the diagnostic accuracies of 7-day patch-type electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring and 24-h Holter monitoring for detecting significant arrhythmias in patients with palpitations. Methods: This was a single-center prospective trial with 58 participants who presented with palpitations, chest pain or syncope. Outcomes were defined as the detection of any one of six arrhythmias, including supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter lasting more than 30 s, pauses of more than 3 s, high-degree atrioventricular block, ventricular tachycardia (VT) >3 beats, or polymorphic VT/ventricular fibrillation. The McNemar test for paired proportions was used to compare arrhythmia detection rates. Results: The overall arrhythmia detection rate was higher with 7-day ECG patch monitoring than with 24-h Holter monitoring (34.5% vs. 19.0%, Conclusions: The results suggest that a 7-day patch-type continuous ECG monitor is more effective for the detection of supraventricular tachycardia than is a 24-h Holter monitor. However, the clinical significance of device detected arrhythmia should be consolidated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.