Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37324662›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2023

Progress, challenge and prospect of plant plastome annotation.

Xiao-Jian Qu, Dan Zou, Rui-Yu Zhang, Gregory W Stull, Ting-Shuang Yi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Plastome evidence repositionsFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Genomic Phylogenetic Analysis ofEcology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Polyphyly ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiao-Jian QuShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Stress Research, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Normal University, Ji'nan, Shandong, China.
Dan ZouShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Stress Research, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Normal University, Ji'nan, Shandong, China.
Rui-Yu ZhangShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Stress Research, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Normal University, Ji'nan, Shandong, China.
Gregory W StullGermplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Ting-Shuang YiGermplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The plastome (plastid genome) represents an indispensable molecular data source for studying phylogeny and evolution in plants. Although the plastome size is much smaller than that of nuclear genome, and multiple plastome annotation tools have been specifically developed, accurate annotation of plastomes is still a challenging task. Different plastome annotation tools apply different principles and workflows, and annotation errors frequently occur in published plastomes and those issued in GenBank. It is therefore timely to compare available annotation tools and establish standards for plastome annotation. In this review, we review the basic characteristics of plastomes, trends in the publication of new plastomes, the annotation principles and application of major plastome annotation tools, and common errors in plastome annotation. We propose possible methods to judge pseudogenes and RNA-editing genes, jointly consider sequence similarity, customed algorithms, conserved domain or protein structure. We also propose the necessity of establishing a database of reference plastomes with standardized annotations, and put forward a set of quantitative standards for evaluating plastome annotation quality for the scientific community. In addition, we discuss how to generate standardized GenBank annotation flatfiles for submission and downstream analysis. Finally, we prospect future technologies for plastome annotation integrating plastome annotation approaches with diverse evidences and algorithms of nuclear genome annotation tools. This review will help researchers more efficiently use available tools to achieve high-quality plastome annotation, and promote the process of standardized annotation of the plastome.

Indexed as

annotation standardschloroplast genomeplastomeprotein structurepseudogenesRNA-editing genes

Identifiers

PMID37324662
PMCPMC10266425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.