Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37324632›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Assessment and diagnosis of right ventricular failure-retrospection and future directions.

Sun Kyun Ro, Kei Sato, Shinichi Ijuin, Declan Sela, Gabriele Fior, Silver Heinsar, Ji Young Kim, Jonathan Chan, Hideaki Nonaka, Aaron C W Lin and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Sun Kyun Ro *Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kei Sato *Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Shinichi IjuinCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Declan SelaCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Gabriele FiorCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Silver HeinsarCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Ji Young KimDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jonathan ChanDivision of Cardiology, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Hideaki NonakaDivision of Cardiology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Aaron C W LinDivision of Cardiology, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Gianluigi Li BassiCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
David G PlattsFaculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Nchafatso G ObonyoCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Jacky Y SuenCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
John F FraserCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The right ventricle (RV) has a critical role in hemodynamics and right ventricular failure (RVF) often leads to poor clinical outcome. Despite the clinical importance of RVF, its definition and recognition currently rely on patients' symptoms and signs, rather than on objective parameters from quantifying RV dimensions and function. A key challenge is the geometrical complexity of the RV, which often makes it difficult to assess RV function accurately. There are several assessment modalities currently utilized in the clinical settings. Each diagnostic investigation has both advantages and limitations according to its characteristics. The purpose of this review is to reflect on the current diagnostic tools, consider the potential technological advancements and propose how to improve the assessment of right ventricular failure. Advanced technique such as automatic evaluation with artificial intelligence and 3-dimensional assessment for the complex RV structure has a potential to improve RV assessment by increasing accuracy and reproducibility of the measurements. Further, noninvasive assessments for RV-pulmonary artery coupling and right and left ventricular interaction are also warranted to overcome the load-related limitations for the accurate evaluation of RV contractile function. Future studies to cross-validate the advanced technologies in various populations are required.

Indexed as

assessmentfuture development.knowledge gapparametersright ventricular failure

Identifiers

PMID37324632
PMCPMC10268009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.