ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2023
Association between CZT‑SPECT myocardial blood flow and coronary stenosis: A cross‑sectional study.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex-Specific Associations With Abnormal Myocardial Flow Reserve in Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From a Real-World Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride SPECT Study.Clinical cardiology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic and prognostic value of myocardial flow reserve quantification with single photon emission computed tomography - a systematic review and meta-analysis.EJNMMI research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The association between the quantitative and semi-quantitative parameters of myocardial blood flow obtained using cadmium-zinc-telluride single photon emission computed tomography (CZT-SPECT) and coronary stenosis remains unclear. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of two parameters obtained using CZT-SPECT in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. A total of 24 consecutive patients who underwent CZT-SPECT and coronary angiography within 3 months of each other were included in the study. To evaluate the predictive ability of the regional difference score (DS), coronary flow reserve (CFR), and the combination thereof for positive coronary stenosis at the vascular level, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted and the area under the curves (AUCs) were calculated. Comparisons of the reclassification ability for coronary stenosis between different parameters were assessed by calculating the net reclassification index (NRI) and the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). The 24 participants (median age: 65 years; range: 46-79 years; 79.2% male) included in this study had a total of 72 major coronary arteries. When stenosis ≥50% was defined as the criteria for positive coronary stenosis, the AUCs and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for regional DS, CFR, and the combination of the two indices were 0.653 (CI, 0.541-0.766), 0.731 (CI, 0.610-0.852) and 0.757 (CI, 0.645-0.869), respectively. Compared with single DS, the combination of DS and CFR increased the predictive ability for positive stenosis, with an NRI of 0.197-1.060 (P<0.01) and an IDI of 0.0150-0.1391 (P<0.05). When stenosis ≥75% was considered as the criteria, the AUCs were 0.760 (CI, 0.614-0.906), 0.703 (CI, 0.550-0.855), and 0.811 (CI, 0.676-0.947), respectively. Compared with DS, CFR had an IDI of -0.3392 to -02860 (P<0.05) and the combination of DS and CFR also enhanced the predictive ability, with an NRI of 0.0313-1.0758 (P<0.01). In conclusion, both regional DS and CFR had diagnostic values for coronary stenosis, but the diagnostic abilities differed in distinguishing between different degrees of stenosis, and the efficiency was improved with a combination of DS and CFR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.