ArticleJTCVS techniques2023
Additional superdrainage reduces anastomotic fistula and stenosis after gastric tube reconstruction with cervical anastomosis for esophageal cancer.
Article in JTCVS techniques, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Successful cure of a patient with tracheoesophageal fistula in cervical esophageal cancer: A case report and review of literature.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the blood flow in reconstructed gastric tube and its relation to anastomosis leakage.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Gastric pull-up is a common procedure to reconstruct the continuity of the upper digestive tract after esophagectomy. However, this technique sometimes causes postoperative anastomotic leakage or stricture, resulting from congestion of the gastric tube. We performed additional microvascular venous anastomoses to solve this problem. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative anastomotic leaks and strictures in cases with or without additional venous superdrainage after gastric tube reconstruction. Methods: A total of 117 consecutive patients with cervical and thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction in the National Nagasaki Medical Center between 2011 and 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Of these patients, 46 did not undergo additional venous anastomoses (standard group), and 71 who underwent gastric pull-up surgery after November 2014 have added this surgical procedure to their routine (superdrainage group). We compared the frequency of postsurgical leakage and stricture in the 2 groups retrospectively. Results: Fifteen patients (32.6%) developed postoperative leakage in the standard group and 6 (8.5%) did so in the superdrainage group. Twelve patients (26.1%) showed postoperative anastomotic stricture in the standard group and 7 (9.9%) did so in the superdrainage group. Patients who did not undergo additional venous superdrainage were significantly more likely to develop postsurgical leakage (χ Conclusions: Our study revealed that performing additional venous anastomosis for as little as 1 hour can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative leakage and stenosis. This procedure is of merit to perform after total esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.