SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2023
Association of
Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association ofFrontiers in endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- Molecular Genetics of β-Cell Compensation in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Insights from CDKAL1, SLC30A8 and HHEX.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Emerging biomarkers for gestational diabetes mellitus and related pediatric outcomes.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2025Review
- Association betweenFrontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Article
- Placental Expression of Glucose and Zinc Transporters in Women with Gestational Diabetes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Mechanisms and Physiological Roles of Polymorphisms in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Genetic and inflammatory factors underlying gestational diabetes mellitus: a review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Methods: The research objective was to select 500 patients with GDM and 502 control subjects. Rs13266634 and rs2466293 were genotyped using the SNPscan™ genotyping assay. Statistical tests, such as the chi-square test, t-test, logistic regression, ANOVA, and meta-analysis, were conducted to determine the differences in genotypes, alleles, and their associations with GDM risk. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in age, pregestational BMI, SBP, DBP, and parity between individuals with GDM and healthy subjects ( Conclusion: The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.