Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37324113›Full record

ArticleBiochemia medica2023

Definition of icteric interference index for six biochemical analytes.

Ruth Cano-Corres, Gemma Sole-Enrech, Maria Isabel Aparicio-Calvente

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemia medica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ruth Cano-CorresClinical laboratory, Biochemistry Department, Parc Taulí Research and Innovation Institute Foundation (I3PT), Sabadell, Spain.
Gemma Sole-EnrechClinical laboratory, Biochemistry Department, Parc Taulí Research and Innovation Institute Foundation (I3PT), Sabadell, Spain.
Maria Isabel Aparicio-CalventeClinical laboratory, Biochemistry Department, Parc Taulí Research and Innovation Institute Foundation (I3PT), Sabadell, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Icterus, if not detected, can affect the validity of results delivered by clinical laboratories, leading to erroneous results. This study aims to define bilirubin interference for some biochemical analytes and compare it with the manufacturer's data. Material and methods: Serum pools prepared with outpatients' samples were spiked with increasing bilirubin concentration (Merck, reference14370, Darmstadt, Germany) up to 513 µmol/L in order to evaluate the bias for the following biochemical analytes: creatinine (CREA), creatine kinase (CK), cholesterol (CHOL), gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), and total protein (TP). For each analyte, six pools of different concentrations were prepared. Measurements were made employing Cobas 8000 analyser c702-502, Roche Diagnostics (Mannheim, Germany). This study employed a study procedure defined by the Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine. Results: Obtained bilirubin concentrations producing a negative interference were 103 µmol/L for CHOL, 205 µmol/L for TP and 410 µmol/L for CK, but only for CK values less than 100 U/L. Bilirubin concentrations lower than 513 µmol/L do not produce interference for HDL and GGT. Finally, for the studied bilirubin concentrations, there is no interference for CREA higher than 80 µmol/L. Conclusion: Icterus interferences have been defined for each analyte, observing differences compared to data provided by the manufacturer. The evidence indicates that each laboratory should evaluate icteric interferences to ensure the high quality of the delivered results, thus benefiting patient care.

Indexed as

CholesterolJaundiceBilirubinCreatine KinaseCreatinineHumansSerumBilirubinCholesterolCreatine KinaseCreatininebiochemical analytesicterusicterus interference

Identifiers

PMID37324113
PMCPMC10231764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.