ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2023
Analysis of heart displacement during thoracic radiotherapy based on electrocardiograph-gated 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deducing cardiorespiratory motion of cardiac substructures using a novel 5D-MRI workflow for radiotherapy.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Cardiac substructure delineation in radiation therapy - A state-of-the-art review.Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Periodic cardiac movement may expose the heart to radiation field induced damage, leading to radiation-induced heart disease (RIHD). Studies have proven that delineation of the heart based on planning CT fails to show the real margin of the substructures and a compensatory margin should be applied. The purpose of this study was to quantify the dynamic changes and the compensatory extension range by breath-hold and electrocardiogram gated 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4D-MRI), which had the advantage of discriminating soft tissues. Methods: Eventually, 15 patients with oesophageal or lung cancers were enrolled, including one female and nine males aged from 59 to 77 years from December 10 Results: The extent of movement of heart and its substructures during one cardiac cycle were approximately 4.0-26.1 millimetre (mm) in anterior-posterior (AP), left-right (LR), and cranial-caudal (CC) axes, and the compensatory margins should be applied to planning CT by extending the margins by 1.7, 3.6, 1.8, 3.0, 2.1, and 2.9 centimetres (cm) for pericardium; 1.2, 2.5, 1.0, 2.8, 1.8, and 3.3 cm for heart; 3.8, 3.4, 3.1, 2.8, 0.9, and 2.0 cm for interatrial septum; 3.3, 4.9, 2.0, 4.1, 1.1, and 2.9 cm for interventricular septum; 2.2, 3.0, 1.1, 5.3, 1.8, and 2.4 cm for left ventricular muscle (LVM); 5.9, 3.4, 2.1, 6.1, 5.4, and 3.6 cm for antero-lateral papillary muscle (ALPM); and 6.6, 2.9, 2.6, 6.6, 3.9, and 4.8 cm for postero-medial papillary muscle (PMPM) in anterior, posterior, left, right, cranial, and caudal directions, respectively. Conclusions: Periodic cardiac activity causes obvious displacement of the heart and its substructures, and the motion amplitude of substructures differs. Extending a certain margin as the compensatory extension to represent the organs at risk (OAR) and then limiting the dose-volume parameters could be performed in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.