Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37324069›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2023

Differentiating between tuberculous and non-tuberculous pleural effusions using the pleural fluid ratio of 10× adenosine deaminase/lactate dehydrogenase.

Yan Li, Zhujun Chen, Pan Yang, Hailing Duan, Jian He, Liang Gong, Lintao Zhao

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yan Li *Department of Nephrology, The Key Laboratory for the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease of Chongqing, Chongqing Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urology Diseases, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Zhujun Chen *Department of Respiratory Medicine, The First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Pan YangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Hailing DuanDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Jian HeDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Liang GongDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Lintao ZhaoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The First Hospital Affiliated to Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Army Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adenosine deaminase (ADA) is a sensitive marker of tuberculous pleural effusion (TBPE). However, in pleural effusion (PE), the detection of ADA alone cannot be used to determine whether the increase in the ADA level is caused by the rising proportion of macrophages and lymphocytes in the cell components or by the increase in the total cell number. The diagnostic precision of ADA is probably restricted due to the false positive and negative results. Thus, we explored the clinical value of the ratio of PE ADA to lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in differentiating between TBPE and non-TBPE. Methods: Patients hospitalized with PEs between January 2018 and December 2021 were retrospectively recruited for this study. We analyzed the values of ADA, LDH, and 10× ADA/LDH in the patients with TBPE and non-TBPE. We also determined the sensitivity, specificity, Youden index, and area under the curve for 10× ADA/LDH at different ADA levels and evaluated its diagnostic accuracy. Results: In total, 382 patients with PEs were included in the study. Among whom, 144 were diagnosed with TBPE, this supposes a "pre-test probability" >40%. It is quite high, 134 with malignant PEs, 19 with parapneumonic PEs, 43 with empyema, 24 with transudate PEs, and 18 with other types of PE of a known etiology. The ADA levels were positively correlated with the LDH levels in TBPE. LDH levels usually increase in response to cell damage or cell death. The 10× ADA/LDH level was significantly increased in the TBPE patients. In addition, the 10× ADA/LDH level increased as the ADA level increased in TBPE. To differentiate between TBPE and non-TBPE, the optimal cut-off value of 10× ADA/LDH at different ADA levels was assessed using receiver operating curves. At an ADA level >20 U/L, 10× ADA/LDH showed the best diagnostic performance, and had a specificity and sensitivity of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.84-0.98) and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.88-0.98), respectively. Conclusions: The 10× ADA/LDH dependent diagnostic index can be used to distinguish TBPE from non-TBPE and could be used to guide future clinical decisions.

Indexed as

Adenosine deaminase (ADA)lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)malignant pleural effusion (MPE)parapneumonic effusion (PPE)tuberculous pleural effusion (TBPE)

Identifiers

PMID37324069
PMCPMC10267918
OpenAlexW4380075631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.