Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37324027›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Optimizing patient selection for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer after initial chemotherapy - a single center prospective cohort.

D Doppenberg, F J Lagerwaard, S van Dieren, M R Meijerink, J J van der Vliet, M G Besselink, G van Tienhoven, E Versteijne, B J Slotman, J W Wilmink and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

D DoppenbergAmsterdam UMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
F J LagerwaardAmsterdam UMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
S van DierenAmsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
M R MeijerinkCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
J J van der VlietCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
M G BesselinkCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
G van TienhovenAmsterdam UMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
E VersteijneAmsterdam UMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
B J SlotmanAmsterdam UMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
J W WilminkCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
G KazemierCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
A M E BruynzeelAmsterdam UMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLCancer Center AmsterdamLava Therapeutics (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The role of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) as local treatment option after chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is evolving. However adequate patient selection criteria for SABR in patients with LAPC are lacking. Methods: A prospective institutional database collected data of patients with LAPC treated with chemotherapy, mainly FOLFIRINOX, followed by SABR, which was delivered using magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy, 40 Gy in 5 fractions within two weeks. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors for OS. Results: Overall, 74 patients were included, median age 66 years, 45.9% had a KPS score of ≥90. Median OS was 19.6 months from diagnosis and 12.1 months from start of SABR. Local control was 90% at one year. Multivariable Cox regression analyses identified KPS ≥90, age <70, and absence of pain prior to SABR as independent favorable predictors for OS. The rate of grade ≥3 fatigue and late gastro-intestinal toxicity was 2.7%. Conclusions: SABR is a well-tolerated treatment in patients with unresectable LAPC following chemotherapy, with better outcomes when applied in patients with higher performance score, age <70 years and absence of pain. Future randomized trials will have to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

LAPCMRgRTpancreatic cancerpatient selectionradiotherapySABR

Identifiers

PMID37324027
PMCPMC10264658
OpenAlexW4378901870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.