Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37324004›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Case Report: Should Regorafenib be prescribed as a continuous schedule in gastrointestinal stromal tumors? Three case reports on Regorafenib personalized schedule.

Maria Susanna Grimaudo, Alice Laffi, Nicolò Gennaro, Roberta Fazio, Federico D'Orazio, Laura Samà, Licia Vanessa Siracusano, Federico Sicoli, Salvatore Lorenzo Renne, Armando Santoro and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Susanna GrimaudoDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Alice LaffiDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Nicolò GennaroDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Roberta FazioDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Federico D'OrazioDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Laura SamàDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Licia Vanessa SiracusanoDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Federico SicoliDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Salvatore Lorenzo RenneDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
Armando SantoroDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
Alexia Francesca BertuzziDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITHumanitas University · ITNorthwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Regorafenib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), colorectal cancer, and hepatocarcinoma. Anyway, the toxicity profile of Regorafenib standard schedule is associated with poor compliance and a high rate of discontinuation. For this reason, there is a growing need for a Regorafenib personalized schedule emerging from the scientific community. Objective: The aim of this case series was to describe the experience of our sarcoma referral center with the continuous administration of Regorafenib as an alternative regimen to treat metastatic GIST patients. Methods: We retrospectively collected clinical, pathological, and radiological data of patients with metastatic GIST treated with daily personalized Regorafenib at a single tertiary referral center from May 2021 to December 2022. Results: We identified three patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria. The average follow-up since the start of Regorafenib was 19.1 months (12-25 months). All three patients had started a standard third-line Regorafenib schedule according to guidelines. The reasons for switching to a continuous schedule were as follows: exacerbation of symptoms during week-off treatment in the first patient, a serious adverse event (AE) in the second patient, and a combination of both conditions in the third. After switching, none of the patients reported severe AEs, and they improved control of tumor-related symptoms. Two of the patients experienced disease progression after 16 months (9 months of which is continuous schedule) and 12 months (8.1 months of which is continuous schedule) of Regorafenib, respectively; the third patient is still receiving continuous Regorafenib at the time of writing, with a progression-free survival of 25 months (14 months after the modified schedule start). Conclusion: With a similar efficacy and lower toxicities, a daily, personalized Regorafenib schedule seems to be a promising alternative to the standard regimen for metastatic GIST patients, including the frail ones. Further prospective analyses are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of such regimen.

Indexed as

case reportGISTpersonalized therapyRegorafenibsarcoma

Identifiers

PMID37324004
PMCPMC10264664
OpenAlexW4378906052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.