Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37324000›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Esketamine opioid-free intravenous anesthesia versus opioid intravenous anesthesia in spontaneous ventilation video-assisted thoracic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Qisen Fan, Jinhui Luo, Qianling Zhou, Yaoliang Zhang, Xin Zhang, Jiayang Li, Long Jiang, Lan Lan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qisen FanDepartment of Anesthesia, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jinhui LuoDepartment of Anesthesia, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qianling ZhouDepartment of Medical Imaging, Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Yaoliang ZhangDepartment of Anesthesia, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xin ZhangDepartment of Anesthesia, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiayang LiDepartment of Anesthesia, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Long JiangNational Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease and Departments of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Lan LanDepartment of Anesthesia, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Guangzhou Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) provides adequate analgesia and can reduce postoperative opioid consumption, but its efficacy in spontaneous ventilation video-assisted thoracic surgery (SV-VATS) has not been demonstrated. We aimed to investigate the hypothesis that OFA could provide the same perioperative pain control as opioid anesthesia (OA), maintain safe and stable respiration and hemodynamics during surgery, and improve postoperative recovery. Methods: Sixty eligible patients (OFA group: n=30; OA group: n=30) treated between September 15, 2022, and December 15, 2022, at The First Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University were included. They were randomized to receive standard balanced OFA with esketamine or OA with remifentanil combined with sufentanil. The primary outcome was the pain numeric rating score (NRS) at postoperative 24 h, and the secondary outcomes were intraoperative respiratory and hemodynamic data, opioid consumption, vasoactive drug dosage, and recovery in the post-anesthesia care unit and ward. Results: There was no significant difference in the postoperative pain scores and recovery quality between the two groups. The OFA group had a significantly lower dose of phenylephrine ( Conclusions: OFA provides the same level of postoperative pain control as OA, but it is more advantageous in maintaining circulatory and respiratory stability and improving the quality of pulmonary collapse in SV-VATS.

Indexed as

mechanical ventilationopioid anesthesiaopioid-free anesthesiaspontaneous ventilationvideo-assisted thoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID37324000
PMCPMC10266098
OpenAlexW4378903397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.