Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37323946›Full record

ArticleAccess microbiology2023

A guide to

Sarah M Prostak, Edgar M Medina, Erik Kalinka, Lillian K Fritz-Laylin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Access microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Establishment of anCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah M ProstakDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.
Edgar M MedinaDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.
Erik KalinkaDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.
Lillian K Fritz-LaylinDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9237-9403
University of Massachusetts Amherst · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chytrid fungi play key ecological roles in aquatic ecosystems, and some species cause a devastating skin disease in frogs and salamanders. Additionally, chytrids occupy a unique phylogenetic position- sister to the well-studied Dikarya (the group including yeasts, sac fungi, and mushrooms) and related to animals- making chytrids useful for answering important evolutionary questions. Despite their importance, little is known about the basic cell biology of chytrids. A major barrier to understanding chytrid biology has been a lack of genetic tools with which to test molecular hypotheses. Medina and colleagues recently developed a protocol for

Indexed as

AgrobacteriumAgrobacterium-mediated transformationchytrid fungichytridsgenetic toolsSpizellomyces punctatustransformation

Identifiers

PMID37323946
PMCPMC10267658
OpenAlexW4376134803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.