ArticleAccess microbiology2023
COVID-19 PCR: frequency of internal control inhibition in clinical practice.
Article in Access microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Development of a Melting-Curve-Based Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for the Simultaneous Detection of Viruses Causing Respiratory Infection.Microorganisms · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Diagnosis of COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) is best performed with real-time (quantitative) PCR (qPCR), the most sensitive method for detection and quantification of viral RNA. Using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) protocol, for each sample tested for the virus, three qPCR tests are performed, targeting the viral genes N1 and N2, in addition to the internal control gene RNase P. Samples in which internal control fails to amplify should be labelled 'invalid'. Methods: This study aims to determine the frequency of inhibition of the RNase P gene used as an internal control in qPCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) in a reference hospital in Southern Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic (1 February 2021 to 31 March 2021). Results: A total 10, 311 samples were available for analysis. The mean cycle threshold (Ct) value for the RNAse P gene was 26.65 and the standard deviation was 3.18. A total of 252 samples were inhibited (2.4%) during the study period: amongst these, 77 (30.5%) showed late amplifications (beyond 2 standard deviations from the mean Ct value), and 175 (69.4%) revealed no fluorescence at all for the RNase P gene. Conclusions: This study showed a low percentage of inhibition using RNase P as an internal control in COVID-19 PCRs using the CDC protocol, thus proving the effectiveness of this protocol for identification of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples. Re-extraction was efficacious for samples that showed little or no fluorescence for the RNase P gene.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.