ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023
Comparison of gut microbiome composition in colonic biopsies, endoscopically-collected and at-home-collected stool samples.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gut-on-Chip Models for Host-Microbiome Studies: A Systematic Review.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- The Female Reproductive Microbiome: Mechanistic Insights and Bioengineering Perspectives.Biology · 2026Review
- Machine learning-based assessment of the healthy human gut mycobiota landscape using ITS1 DNA metabarcoding data.BioData mining · 2026Article
- Faecal microbiome, gastrointestinal integrity, inflammation and thermoregulation in recent exertional heat illness patients and matched controls.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Diet, mycobiome and virome: from mucosal immunity to gut-brain axis regulation.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Dual-approach analysis of gut microbiome in patients with type 1 diabetes and diabetic kidney disease.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- SHAP-based binarization enhances metataxonomic machine learning with application to gut microbiota of inflammatory bowel disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Targeting the Gut Microbiota's Role in Host Energy Absorption With Precision Nutrition Interventions for the Prevention and Treatment of Obesity.Nutrition reviews · 2025Review
- Controversies in management of Helicobacter pylori infection from a U.S. perspective: population screening and treatment.Minerva gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Deep Sequencing of Crohn's Disease Lamina Propria Phagocytes Identifies Pathobionts and Correlates With Pro-Inflammatory Gene Expression.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2025Article
- Antibiotic-perturbed microbiota and the role of probiotics.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025Review
- Correlation of the intestinal flora and its metabolites with the colonic transport function in functional constipation.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Gut Microbiota Comparison in Rectal Swabs Versus Stool Samples in Cats with Kidney Stones.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- The role of gut microbiota and metabolites in cancer chemotherapy.Journal of advanced research · 2024Review
- Metagenomic analysis of colonic tissue and stool microbiome in patients with colorectal cancer in a South Asian population.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Oral administration of lysozyme protects against injury of ileum via modulating gut microbiota dysbiosis after severe traumatic brain injury.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
- Diversity of the microbiota communities found in the various regions of the intestinal tract in healthy individuals and inflammatory bowel diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Aim: The goal of this study is to compare microbiome composition in three different sample types in women, namely stool brought from home vs. solid stool samples obtained at the time of an unprepped sigmoidoscopy vs. biopsies of the colonic mucosa at the time of an unprepped sigmoidoscopy, using alpha- and beta-diversity metrics following bacterial 16S rRNA sequencing. The findings may have relevance to health and disease states in which bacterial metabolism has a significant impact on molecules/metabolites that are recirculated between the gut lumen and mucosa and systemic circulation, such as estrogens (as in breast cancer) or bile acids. Methods: Concomitant at-home-collected stool, endoscopically-collected stool, and colonic biopsy samples were collected from 48 subjects (24 breast cancer, 24 control.) After 16S rRNA sequencing, an amplicon sequence variant (ASV) based approach was used to analyze the data. Alpha diversity metrics (Chao1, Pielou's Evenness, Faith PD, Shannon, and Simpson) and beta diversity metrics (Bray-Curtis, Weighted and Unweighted Unifrac) were calculated. LEfSe was used to analyze differences in the abundance of various taxa between sample types. Results: Alpha and beta diversity metrics were significantly different between the three sample types. Biopsy samples were different than stool samples in all metrics. The highest variation in microbiome diversity was noted in the colonic biopsy samples. At-home and endoscopically-collected stool showed more similarities in count-based and weighted beta diversity metrics. There were significant differences in rare taxa and phylogenetically-diverse taxa between the two types of stool samples. Generally, there were higher levels of Proteobacteria in biopsy samples, with significantly more Actinobacteria and Firmicutes in stool (all Conclusion: Our data shows that different sampling methods can impact results when looking at the composition of the gut microbiome using ASV-based approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.