Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37323884›Full record

ReviewExploration (Beijing, China)2022

Organic fluorescent nanoprobes with NIR-IIb characteristics for deep learning.

Kevin Wanderi, Zongqiang Cui

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Exploration (Beijing, China), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Intranodal injection of neoantigen-bearing engineeredActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Synthesis of Pyridin-1(2Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kevin WanderiState Key Laboratory of Virology Wuhan Institute of Virology Center for Biosafety Mega-Science Chinese Academy of Sciences Wuhan China.
Zongqiang CuiState Key Laboratory of Virology Wuhan Institute of Virology Center for Biosafety Mega-Science Chinese Academy of Sciences Wuhan China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1564-272X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Illumination of biological events with near-infrared II sub-channel (NIR-IIb, 1500-1700 nm) enhances the transparency of biological tissues, which is very attractive for deep imaging. Due to the long-wavelength, which reduces optical damage, suppresses autofluorescence, and obviates light scattering, NIR-IIb nanoprobes afford deep tissue penetration with unprecedented spatiotemporal resolution. Hence, NIR-IIb imaging facilitates deep learning and decipherment of biological proceedings in living organisms with astounding high clarity. In comparison to its predecessors in the visible-near-infrared spectrum, imaging in the NIR-IIb has shown great potential for tissue imaging and extrapolating imaging applications for clinical studies. However, the use of organic fluorescent nanoprobes (OFNPs) in the NIR-IIb region is still rare since it is in its early stages. Thus, herein we aim to survey the recent development of different organic fluorescent nanomaterials with NIR-IIb characteristics, their unique photophysical properties, and their utilization in deep imaging in animal models. Further, practical researches on organic fluorescent nanoprobes with NIR-IIb emission and their transition to clinical applications are highlighted.

Indexed as

deep learningnanotechnologyNIR‐IIb windoworganic fluorescent nanoprobessmall‐animals imaging

Identifiers

PMID37323884
PMCPMC10191020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.