Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37323844›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2023

Impact of

Carolina Trujillo-Peralta, Juan David Latorre, Jianmin Chai, Roberto Senas-Cuesta, Aaron Forga, Makenly Coles, Jiangchao Zhao, Xochitl Hernandez-Velasco, Guillermo Tellez-Isaias, John Barta and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Carolina Trujillo-PeraltaDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Juan David LatorreDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Jianmin ChaiSchool of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, China.
Roberto Senas-CuestaDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Aaron ForgaDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Makenly ColesDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Jiangchao ZhaoDepartment of Animal Science, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Xochitl Hernandez-VelascoDepartamento de Medicina y Zootecnia de Aves, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, UNAM, Mexico City, Mexico.
Guillermo Tellez-IsaiasDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
John BartaDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Lisa BielkeDepartment of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, United States.
Billy HargisDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
Danielle GrahamDepartment of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
University of Arkansas System · USFoshan University · CNSecretariat of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development, Fisheries and Food · MXThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville · USUniversity of Guelph · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Drug-sensitive live coccidiosis vaccines have been used to control coccidiosis and renew drug sensitivity in commercial chicken operations. However, only limited species coverage vaccines have been available for commercial turkey producers. This study aimed to assess the effect of an Methods: Experimental groups included: (1) NC (non-vaccinated, non-challenged control); (2) PC (non-vaccinated, challenged control); (3) VX + Amprol ( Results and Discussion: VX did not affect performance during the pre-challenge period. At d23-29 (post-challenge), VX groups had significantly (

Indexed as

amproliumcoccidiosisEimeriamicrobiometurkeyvaccination

Identifiers

PMID37323844
PMCPMC10267373
OpenAlexW4379057940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.