Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37323828›Full record

ArticleJournal of offender rehabilitation2022

Analyses of the TCU Drug Screen 5: Using an Item Response Theory Model with a Sample of Juvenile Justice Youth.

Amanda L Wiese, Thomas B Sease, Danica Knight, Kevin Knight

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of offender rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amanda L WieseInstitute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, USA.
Thomas B SeaseInstitute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, USA.
Danica KnightInstitute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, USA.
Kevin KnightInstitute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, USA.

Funding

TRANSFERRING DRUG ABUSE TREATMENT AND ASSESSMENT RESOURCR01DA013093 · NIDA · TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY · PI FLYNN, PATRICK M · 1999 to 2014
$3.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is important to identify substance use disorders among youth who enter the juvenile justice system using a validated screener, such as the Texas Christian University Drug Screen 5 (TCU DS 5), so that necessary services can be provided to youth in need of treatment. While the TCU DS 5 is a valid, evidence-based screener, the use of an Item Response Theory model may better differentiate between mild, moderate, and severe forms of substance use disorders. The current study analyzed the feasibility and incremental value gained in using an Item Response Theory model to compute drug use severity scores as compared to its current scoring methodology. Results showed that while Item Response Theory may not be worthwhile as the standard method of scoring, item level analyses revealed there are benefits to using Item Response Theory to determine which items on a screener are most suggestive of severe substance use problems.

Indexed as

adolescentsitem response theoryjuvenile justicepsychometric evaluationsubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID37323828
PMCPMC10263186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.