Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37323811›Full record

ArticleNational science review2023

Data quantity governance for machine learning in materials science.

Yue Liu, Zhengwei Yang, Xinxin Zou, Shuchang Ma, Dahui Liu, Maxim Avdeev, Siqi Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in National science review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Intelligent Computing for Future Layered Cathodes in Sodium-Ion Batteries.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Peroxidase-Mimicking Nanozymes for Rapid Detection of Infectious Diseases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yue LiuSchool of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai200444, China.
Zhengwei YangSchool of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai200444, China.
Xinxin ZouSchool of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai200444, China.
Shuchang MaSchool of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai200444, China.
Dahui LiuSchool of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai200444, China.
Maxim AvdeevAustralian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Sydney 2232, Australia.
Siqi ShiState Key Laboratory of Advanced Special Steel, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai200444, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8988-9763

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data-driven machine learning (ML) is widely employed in the analysis of materials structure-activity relationships, performance optimization and materials design due to its superior ability to reveal latent data patterns and make accurate prediction. However, because of the laborious process of materials data acquisition, ML models encounter the issue of the mismatch between a high dimension of feature space and a small sample size (for traditional ML models) or the mismatch between model parameters and sample size (for deep-learning models), usually resulting in terrible performance. Here, we review the efforts for tackling this issue via feature reduction, sample augmentation and specific ML approaches, and show that the balance between the number of samples and features or model parameters should attract great attention during data quantity governance. Following this, we propose a synergistic data quantity governance flow with the incorporation of materials domain knowledge. After summarizing the approaches to incorporating materials domain knowledge into the process of ML, we provide examples of incorporating domain knowledge into governance schemes to demonstrate the advantages of the approach and applications. The work paves the way for obtaining the required high-quality data to accelerate materials design and discovery based on ML.

Indexed as

data governancedata quantitymachine learningmaterials science

Identifiers

PMID37323811
PMCPMC10265966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.