ArticleHardwareX2023
A low-cost robotic hand prosthesis with apparent haptic sense controlled by electroencephalographic signals.
Article in HardwareX, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a Low-Cost Mechanical Hand Prosthesis with Varied Grasp Positions.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- High accuracy EEG signal classification for brain computer interfaces using advanced neural architectures.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Emerging Frontiers in Robotic Upper-Limb Prostheses: Mechanisms, Materials, Tactile Sensors and Machine Learning-Based EMG Control: A Comprehensive Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Exploring pathways toward open-hardware ecosystems to safeguard genetic resources for biomedical research communities using aquatic model species.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2024Review
- Soft-stable interface in grasping multiple objects by wiring-tension.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the biggest problems faced by amputees is obtaining a suitable low-cost prosthesis. To address this problem, the design and implementation of a transradial prosthesis controlled by electroencephalographic (EEG) signals was carried out. This prosthesis is an alternative to prostheses using electromyographic (EMG) signals, which are very complex and exhausting for the patient to execute. We collected EEG signal data using the Emotiv Insight Headset, which were then processed to control the movement of the prosthesis, known as the Zero Arm. Additionally, we incorporated Machine Learning algorithms to classify different types of objects and shapes. The prosthesis also features a haptic feedback system, which simulates the function of mechanoreceptors in the skin, providing the user with a sense of touch when using the prosthesis. Our research has yielded a viable and cost-effective prosthetic limb. We utilized 3D printing and easily obtainable servomotors and controllers, making the prosthesis affordable and accessible. Performance tests of the Zero Arm prosthesis have yielded promising results. The prosthesis demonstrated an average success rate of 86.67% across various tasks, indicating its reliability and effectiveness. Additionally, the prosthesis has an average recognition rate of 70% for different types of objects, a noteworthy accomplishment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.