ArticleExploration (Beijing, China)2021
Exploring new battery knowledge by advanced characterizing technologies.
Article in Exploration (Beijing, China), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elucidating and Optimizing I Occupation in Lithium Argyrodite Solid Electrolytes for Advanced All-Solid-State Li Metal Batteries.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2025Article
- Advanced electrode design enables homogeneous electric field distribution for metal deposition studies viaiScience · 2024Article
- A Universal Spinning-Coordinating Strategy to Construct Continuous Metal-Nitrogen-Carbon Heterointerface with Boosted Lithium Polysulfides Immobilization for 3D-Printed LiS Batteries.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- Challenges and advances of organic electrode materials for sustainable secondary batteries.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2022Review
- Exploring new battery knowledge by advanced characterizing technologies.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exploration of science and technologies represents human's thirst for new knowledge and new life. Presently, we are in a stage of transferring the use of fossil fuels to renewable energy, which urgently calls for new energy materials and techniques beyond the boundary of human knowledge. On the way of scrutinizing these materials and surmounting the bottleneck of their performances, characterizing technologies are of critical importance in enabling the revealing of materials regarding their structural and chemical information, eventually establishing the correlations between microstructures and properties at the multiscale levels. Regrettably, traditional characterizations are hard to simultaneously probe electrochemistry with these chemical and physical structural evolutions, especially under operando conditions, or offer high-resolution images of materials sensitive to electron-beam irradiation. To this end, various advanced characterizing and diagnosing technologies recently developed, such as transmission X-ray microscopy and cryo-transmission electron microscopy, have demonstrated their benefits in understanding the energy storage behaviors of high-performance energy materials (such as layered transition oxide cathode and Li metal anode). Benefited from new knowledge, the progress of high-capacity electroactive materials is significantly accelerated. Here, we timely review the breakthroughs in emerging techniques and discuss how they guide the design of future battery materials to achieve the ultimate carbon neutrality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.