Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37323509›Full record

ArticleTobacco induced diseases2023

Effect of smoking-related COVID-19 risk messaging on smoking cessation in community smokers: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Xue Weng, Tzu Tsun Luk, Yongda Socrates Wu, Sheng Zhi Zhao, Derek Yee Tak Cheung, Henry Sau Chai Tong, Vienna Wai Yin Lai, Tai Hing Lam, Man Ping Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco induced diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xue WengInstitute of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai, China.
Tzu Tsun LukSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yongda Socrates WuSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Sheng Zhi ZhaoSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Derek Yee Tak CheungSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Henry Sau Chai TongHong Kong Council on Smoking and Health, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Vienna Wai Yin LaiHong Kong Council on Smoking and Health, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Tai Hing LamSchool of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Man Ping WangSchool of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
University of Hong Kong · HKHong Kong Council on Smoking and Health · CNBeijing Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionObservational and experimental studies have suggested that messaging on smoking-related COVID-19 risk may promote smoking abstinence, but evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is lacking.

methodsThis was a pragmatic RCT in Hong Kong, China, to compare the effectiveness of communicating smoking-related COVID-19 risk with generic cessation support on abstinence. Both groups received brief cessation advice at baseline. The intervention group received messaging on smoking-related COVID-19 risk and cessation support via instant messaging for three months (16 messages in total), which highlighted the increased risk of severe COVID-19 and deaths, and potentially higher risk of viral exposure (e.g. due to mask removal) for smokers. The control group received generic text messaging support for three months (16 messages). The primary outcomes were biochemically validated 7-day point prevalence abstinence (PPA) at 3 and 6 months. Intention to treat analyses was used.

resultsBetween 13 June and 30 October 2020, 1166 participants were randomly assigned to an intervention (n=583) or control (n=583) group. By intention-to-treat, validated 7-day PPA did not significantly differ between the intervention and control groups at three months (9.6% and 11.8%, relative risk, RR=0.81; 95% CI: 0.58-1.13, p=0.22) or six months (9.3% and 11.7%, RR=0.79; 95% CI: 0.57-1.11, p=0.18). A higher perceived severity of COVID-19 in smokers at baseline was associated with a greater validated 7-day PPA at six months, and a marginally significant intervention effect on changes in perceived severity from baseline through 6 months was found (p for group × time interaction = 0.08).

conclusionsCommunicating smoking-related COVID-19 risk via instant messaging was not more effective in increasing smoking abstinence than generic cessation support.

trial registrationThe study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov

Indexed as

COVID-19health communicationmobile healthsmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID37323509
PMCPMC10266330
OpenAlexW4380682589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.