Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37323495›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of bioprinting2023

3D-Printed multi-material liver model with simultaneous mechanical and radiological tissue-mimicking features for improved realism.

Laszlo Jaksa, Othniel James Aryeetey, Sepideh Hatamikia, Katharina Nägl, Martin Buschmann, Pahr Dieter H, Gernot Kronreif, Andrea Lorenz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of bioprinting, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laszlo JaksaAustrian Center for Medical Innovation and Technology (ACMIT), Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Othniel James AryeeteyInstitute of Lightweight Design and Structural Biomechanics, Technical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sepideh HatamikiaAustrian Center for Medical Innovation and Technology (ACMIT), Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Katharina NäglInstitute of Lightweight Design and Structural Biomechanics, Technical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Martin BuschmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Pahr Dieter HInstitute of Lightweight Design and Structural Biomechanics, Technical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gernot KronreifAustrian Center for Medical Innovation and Technology (ACMIT), Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Andrea LorenzAustrian Center for Medical Innovation and Technology (ACMIT), Wiener Neustadt, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

89Anatomic models have an important role in the medical domain. However, soft tissue mechanical properties' representation is limited in mass-produced and 3D-printed models. In this study, a multi-material 3D printer was used to print a human liver model featuring tuned mechanical and radiological properties, with the goal of comparing the printed model with its printing material and real liver tissue. The main target was mechanical realism, while radiological similarity was a secondary objective. Materials and internal structure were selected such that the printed model would resemble liver tissue in terms of tensile properties. The model was printed at 33% scaling and 40% gyroid infill with a soft silicone rubber, and silicone oil as a filler fluid. After printing, the liver model underwent CT scanning. Since the shape of the liver is incompatible with tensile testing, tensile testing specimens were also printed. Three replicates were printed with the same internal structure as the liver model and three more out of silicone rubber with 100% rectilinear infill to allow a comparison. All specimens were tested in a four-step cyclic loading test protocol to compare elastic moduli and dissipated energy ratios. The fluid-filled and full-silicone specimens had initial elastic moduli of 0.26 MPa and 0.37 MPa, respectively, and featured dissipated energy ratios of 0.140, 0.167, 0.183, and 0.118, 0.093, 0.081, respectively, in the second, third, and fourth loading cycles. The liver model showed 225 ± 30 Hounsfield units (HU) in CT, which is closer to real human liver (70 ± 30 HU) than the printing silicone (340 ± 50 HU). Results suggest that the liver model became more realistic in terms of mechanical and radiological properties with the proposed printing approach as opposed to printing only with silicone rubber. Thus, it has been demonstrated that this printing method enables new customization opportunities in the field of anatomic models.

Indexed as

3D printingAdditive manufacturingAnatomic modelLiverSilicone

Identifiers

PMID37323495
PMCPMC10261151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.