ArticleInternational journal of bioprinting2023
Developing a bioink for single-step deposition and maturation of human epidermis.
Article in International journal of bioprinting, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Innovations in skin microphysiological systems for nonclinical testing and FDA modernization.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Review
- Deep burn surgery of the whole dorsum of the hand: Composite skin grafting over acellular dermal matrix versus thick split-thickness skin grafting.International wound journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with severe burns, which cause extensive damage to their skin, require rapid intervention to prevent life-threatening hypothermia, infection, and fluid loss. Current treatments typically involve surgical excision of the burned skin and reconstruction of the wound with the aid of skin autografts. However, there is a lack of donor site in the most severe cases. While alternative treatments such as cultured epithelial autografts and "spray-on" skin can allow much smaller donor tissues to be used (and hence reduce donor site morbidity), they present their own challenges in terms of fragility of the tissues and control of the cell deposition, respectively. Recent advances in bioprinting technology have led researchers to explore its use to fabricate skin grafts, which depend on several factors, including appropriate bioinks, cell types, and printability. In this work, we describe a collagen-based bioink that allows the deposition of a contiguous layer of the keratinocytes directly onto the wound. Special attention was given to the intended clinical workflow. For example, since media changes are not feasible once the bioink is deposited onto the patient, we first developed a media formulation designed to permit a single deposition step and promote self-organization of the cells into the epidermis. Using a collagen-based dermal template populated with dermal fibroblasts, we demonstrated by immunofluorescence staining that the resulting epidermis recapitulates the features of natural skin in expressing p63 (stem cell marker), Ki67 and keratin 14 (proliferation markers), filaggrin and keratin 10 (keratinocyte differentiation and barrier function markers), and collagen type IV (basement membrane protein involved in adherence of the epidermis to the dermis). While further tests are still required to verify its utility as a burn treatment, based on the results we have achieved thus far, we believe that our current protocol can already produce donor-specific model for testing purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.