ReviewInternational journal of bioprinting2023
Evolution of bioprinting and current applications.
Review in International journal of bioprinting, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Additive Manufacturing of Biomaterials: Integrated Translational Ecosystems, Process-Structure-Property Interactions and Emerging Paradigms for Next-Generation Biomedical Engineering.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Advancing transdermal drug delivery through 4D bioprinting and dynamic skin modelling.Frontiers in drug delivery · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in 3D Bioprinting of Porous Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: A Narrative and Critical Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Study of Printable and Biocompatible Alginate-Carbon Hydrogels for Sensor Applications: Mechanical, Electrical, and Cytotoxicity Evaluation.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Fabrication of a 3D Corneal Model Using Collagen Bioink and Human Corneal Stromal Cells.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Advances in 3D bioprinting to enhance translational applications in bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.Histology and histopathology · 2025Review
- Emerging applications and research trends of 3D printing and bioprinting in thoracic surgery: a bibliometric and visualized analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Three-Dimensional Bioprinting as a Tool for Tissue Engineering: A Review.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Review
- 3D Bioprinting in Cancer Modeling and Biomedicine: From Print Categories to Biological Applications.ACS omega · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioprinting is a very useful tool that has a huge application potential in different fields of science and biotechnology. In medicine, advances in bioprinting are focused on the printing of cells and tissues for skin regeneration and the manufacture of viable human organs, such as hearts, kidneys, and bones. This review provides a chronological overview of some of the most relevant developments of bioprinting technique and its current status. A search was carried out in SCOPUS, Web of Science, and PubMed databases, and a total of 31,603 papers were found, of which 122 were finally chosen for analysis. These articles cover the most important advances in this technique at the medical level, its applications, and current possibilities. Finally, the paper ends with conclusions about the use of bioprinting and our expectations of this technique. This paper presents a review on the tremendous progress of bioprinting from 1998 to the present day, with many promising results indicating that our society is getting closer to achieving the total reconstruction of damaged tissues and organs and thus solving many healthcare-related problems, including the shortage of organ and tissue donors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.