Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37323471›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2022

Kidney Tumor Detection and Classification Based on Deep Learning Approaches: A New Dataset in CT Scans.

Dalia Alzu'bi, Malak Abdullah, Ismail Hmeidi, Rami AlAzab, Maha Gharaibeh, Mwaffaq El-Heis, Khaled H Almotairi, Agostino Forestiero, Ahmad MohdAziz Hussein, Laith Abualigah

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Dalia Alzu'biDepartment of Computer Information Systems, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 2210, Jordan.
Malak AbdullahDepartment of Computer Information Systems, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 2210, Jordan.
Ismail HmeidiDepartment of Computer Information Systems, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 2210, Jordan.
Rami AlAzabDepartment of General Surgery and Urology, University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.
Maha GharaibehDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 2210, Jordan.
Mwaffaq El-HeisDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 2210, Jordan.
Khaled H AlmotairiComputer Engineering Department, Computer and Information Systems College, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia.
Agostino ForestieroInstitute for High Performance Computing and Networking, CNR, Rende (CS), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3025-7689
Ahmad MohdAziz HusseinDeanship of E-Learning and Distance Education, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia.
Laith AbualigahHourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman 19328, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0002-2203-4549
Jordan University of Science and Technology · JOUmm al-Qura University · SAAl-Ahliyya Amman University · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kidney tumor (KT) is one of the diseases that have affected our society and is the seventh most common tumor in both men and women worldwide. The early detection of KT has significant benefits in reducing death rates, producing preventive measures that reduce effects, and overcoming the tumor. Compared to the tedious and time-consuming traditional diagnosis, automatic detection algorithms of deep learning (DL) can save diagnosis time, improve test accuracy, reduce costs, and reduce the radiologist's workload. In this paper, we present detection models for diagnosing the presence of KTs in computed tomography (CT) scans. Toward detecting and classifying KT, we proposed 2D-CNN models; three models are concerning KT detection such as a 2D convolutional neural network with six layers (CNN-6), a ResNet50 with 50 layers, and a VGG16 with 16 layers. The last model is for KT classification as a 2D convolutional neural network with four layers (CNN-4). In addition, a novel dataset from the King Abdullah University Hospital (KAUH) has been collected that consists of 8,400 images of 120 adult patients who have performed CT scans for suspected kidney masses. The dataset was divided into 80% for the training set and 20% for the testing set. The accuracy results for the detection models of 2D CNN-6 and ResNet50 reached 97%, 96%, and 60%, respectively. At the same time, the accuracy results for the classification model of the 2D CNN-4 reached 92%. Our novel models achieved promising results; they enhance the diagnosis of patient conditions with high accuracy, reducing radiologist's workload and providing them with a tool that can automatically assess the condition of the kidneys, reducing the risk of misdiagnosis. Furthermore, increasing the quality of healthcare service and early detection can change the disease's track and preserve the patient's life.

Indexed as

Deep LearningKidney NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKidneyMaleNeural Networks, ComputerTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID37323471
PMCPMC10266909
OpenAlexW4307136575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.