Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37323340›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Assessment of the Diagnostic Reliability of Modified Alvarado Scores and Abdominal Ultrasonography in Acute Appendicitis.

Piyush Bhardwaj, Aparna Behura, Ipsa Mohapatra, Chinmaya Behera, Subrat Mohanty, Amaresh Mishra, Bandita Panda, Narella S Krishna, K Ranjit

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Piyush BhardwajGeneral Surgery, Radha Devi Jageshwari Memorial Medical College and Hospital, Muzaffarpur, IND.
Aparna BehuraPathology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, PBM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Ipsa MohapatraCommunity Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Chinmaya BeheraSurgery, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Subrat MohantyPediatric Surgery, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Amaresh MishraSurgery, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Bandita PandaResearch and Development, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Narella S KrishnaGeneral Surgery, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, PBM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, IND.
K RanjitGeneral Surgery, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, PBM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Institute of Medical Sciences and Sum Hospital · INMemorial Medical Center · USAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency. Clinical assessment plays a major role; however, subtle clinical features in early stages and atypical presentation makes diagnosis challenging. Ultrasonography (USG) of the abdomen is a usual investigation that aids in diagnosis, however, it is operator dependent. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) of the abdomen is more accurate; however, it exposes the patient to hazardous radiation. The study aimed to combine clinical assessment and USG abdomen in the reliable diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Objectives The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic reliability of the Modified Alvarado Score and ultrasonography of the abdomen in acute appendicitis. Material and methods All patients with right iliac fossa pain, clinically suspected of having acute appendicitis, admitted to the department of general surgery, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Bhubaneswar, between January 2019 and July 2020, who gave consent were included. Clinically, Modified Alvarado Score (MAS) was calculated, after which patients were subjected to USG abdomen, where findings were noted and a sonologic score was calculated. The study group was the patients who needed appendicectomy (n=138). Operative findings were noted. Histopathological diagnosis of acute appendicitis was deemed as confirmatory in these cases and was correlated with MAS and USG scores to determine diagnostic accuracy. Results A combined clinicoradiological (MAS + USG) score of seven showed a sensitivity of 81.8% and a specificity of 100%. The specificity of score seven or above was 100%; however, the sensitivity at 81.8%. The diagnostic accuracy of the clinicoradiological was 87.5%. The negative appendicectomy rate was 4.34%, with a diagnosis of acute appendicitis being confirmed for 95.7% of patients upon histopathological examination. Conclusion The MAS and USG of the abdomen, which is an affordable and non-invasive tool, showed increased diagnostic reliability, and hence it can help reduce the use of CECT abdomen, as CECT abdomen is considered as a gold standard for confirmation or exclusion of diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Use of the combined scoring system of MAS and USG abdomen can be used as a cost-effective alternative.

Indexed as

acute appendicitisalvarado scorediagnosisdiagnostic reliabilityultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID37323340
PMCPMC10262105
OpenAlexW4376565496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.