ArticleCureus2023
Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain in Differentiating Neurocysticercosis From Tuberculoma.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Neurocysticercosis: unwinding the radiological conundrum.Polish journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe two most common infectious causes of ring-enhancing lesions are neurocysticercosis (NCC) and tuberculoma. It is a challenge to differentiate NCC and tuberculomas radiologically since they show the same imaging findings on computed tomography (CT). Hence, this study was performed to assess the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an additional advanced modality to aptly characterize the lesion. Conventional MRI with additional advanced imaging sequences like diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), and post-contrast T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) aids in characterizing the lesion and helps in differentiating NCC and tuberculomas.
objectivesTo compare the findings of DWI, ADC cut-off values, spectroscopy, and contrast-enhanced MRI in differentiating NCC from tuberculoma. MATERIALS AND
methodsIndividuals who matched the inclusion criterion underwent an MRI of the brain (plain and contrast) in a 1.5 Tesla, 18-channel, magnetic resonance scanner (Magnetom Avanto®, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). The following imaging sequences were included: T1WI (axial and sagittal), T2-weighted imaging (axial and coronal), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, DWI at 0, 500, and 1000 mm
resultsIn our study, 42 subjects were included, of which the total number of NCC cases was 25 (59.52%) and tuberculoma was 17 (40.47%). The mean age of patients included was 42.85 ± 14.76 years (21 to 78 years). On post-contrast imaging, all 25 cases of NCC (100%) showed thin ring enhancement whereas the majority of tuberculomas (64.7%) showed thick irregular ring enhancement. On MRS, all 25 cases (100%) of NCC showed an amino acid peak and all 17 cases (100%) of tuberculoma showed a lipid lactate peak. On DWI, out of 25 NCC cases, restriction of diffusion was absent in the majority of cases (88%) and out of 17 cases of tuberculoma, restriction of diffusion was present in 12 cases (70.5%) (T2 hyperintense tuberculoma, indicative of caseating tuberculoma with central liquefaction) and was absent in the rest. In our study, the mean ADC value of NCC lesions (1.30 ± 0.137 x 10
conclusionsConventional MRI with additional advanced imaging sequences like DWI, ADC, MRS, and post-contrast T1WI aids in characterizing the lesion and thereby helps in differentiating NCC and tuberculomas. Hence, multiparametric MRI assessment is useful in making a prompt diagnosis and eliminating the need for a biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.