Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37323256›Full record

ArticleClinical case reports2023

Robotic-assisted percutaneous pelvis fixation: A case report.

Austin F Smith, Jon B Carlson

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Austin F SmithDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Louisville Louisville Kentucky USA.
Jon B CarlsonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Louisville Louisville Kentucky USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1026-7388

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Key Clinical Message: It may be possible to extend the use of the robotic arm to pelvic and acetabular surgery leading to safe, repeatable screw placement, and less radiation exposure for patients, surgeons and OR staff. Abstract: In this case, a novel, robotic-assisted technique was used to place a sacroiliac screw in a patient with unstable injuries of the pelvic ring. Intraoperative and postoperative fluoroscopic, radiographic, and CT imaging demonstrated a safely positioned 6.5 mm cannulated screw without unplanned cortical violation or impingement on neurovascular structures. To our knowledge, this is the first such reported case using a robot widely available in the Americas or Europe.

Indexed as

fracturepelvisrobot‐assistedroboticrobotic armsacroiliac

Identifiers

PMID37323256
PMCPMC10264929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.