ArticleMolecular genetics and metabolism reports2023
Clinical utility of urinary mulberry bodies/cells testing in the diagnosis of Fabry disease.
Article in Molecular genetics and metabolism reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical awareness and targeted manual urine microscopy enable diagnosis of a fabry disease family missed by routine urinalysis.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Detection of mulberry bodies using molecular imaging flow cytometry.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2026Article
- Effects of switching from agalsidase-α to agalsidase-β on biomarkers, renal and cardiac parameters, and disease severity in fabry disease forming neutralizing antidrug antibodies: a case report.CEN case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Variants in the galactosidase alpha ( Methods: We analyzed the medical records of 189 consecutive patients (125 males and 64 females) who underwent MBs/MCs testing. Out of these, two female patients had already been diagnosed with FD at the time of testing, and the remaining 187 patients were suspected of having FD and underwent both Results: Genetic testing did not confirm the diagnosis in 50 females (26.5%); hence, they were excluded from the evaluation. Two patients were previously diagnosed with FD, and sixteen were newly diagnosed. Among these 18 patients, 15, including two who had already developed HCM at diagnosis, remained undiagnosed until targeted genetic screening of at-risk family members of patients with FD was performed. The accuracy of urinary MBs/MCs testing exhibited a sensitivity of 0.944, specificity of 1, positive predictive value of 1, and negative predictive value of 0.992. Conclusions: MBs/MCs testing is highly accurate in diagnosing FD and should be considered during the initial evaluation prior to genetic testing, particularly in female patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.