Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37323213›Full record

ArticleExploration (Beijing, China)2021

Biomaterials and nanomedicine for bone regeneration: Progress and future prospects.

Jun Zhou, Zhongyang Zhang, John Joseph, Xingcai Zhang, Bijan Emiliano Ferdows, Dylan Neal Patel, Wei Chen, Giuseppe Banfi, Roberto Molinaro, Donato Cosco and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Exploration (Beijing, China), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 246 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jun ZhouCenter for Nanomedicine and Department of Anesthesiology Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
Zhongyang ZhangCenter for Nanomedicine and Department of Anesthesiology Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
John JosephCenter for Nanomedicine and Department of Anesthesiology Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
Xingcai ZhangSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences Harvard University Cambridge Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7114-1095
Bijan Emiliano FerdowsCenter for Nanomedicine and Department of Anesthesiology Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
Dylan Neal PatelCenter for Nanomedicine and Department of Anesthesiology Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
Wei ChenCenter for Nanomedicine and Department of Anesthesiology Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
Giuseppe BanfiIRCCS Galeazzi Milano Italy.
Roberto MolinaroIRCCS San Raffaele Hospital Milano Italy.
Donato CoscoDepartment of Health Science Campus Universitario-Germaneto "Magna Græcia" University of Catanzaro Catanzaro Italy.
Na KongCenter for Nanomedicine and Department of Anesthesiology Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
Nitin JoshiCenter for Nanomedicine and Department of Anesthesiology Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
Omid C FarokhzadCenter for Nanomedicine and Department of Anesthesiology Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.
Claudia CorboSchool of Medicine and Surgery Nanomedicine Center Nanomib University of Milano-Bicocca Vedano al Lambro Italy.
Wei TaoCenter for Nanomedicine and Department of Anesthesiology Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4277-3728
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITHarvard University · USMagna Graecia University · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone defects pose a heavy burden on patients, orthopedic surgeons, and public health resources. Various pathological conditions cause bone defects including trauma, tumors, inflammation, osteoporosis, and so forth. Auto- and allograft transplantation have been developed as the most commonly used clinic treatment methods, among which autologous bone grafts are the golden standard. Yet the repair of bone defects, especially large-volume defects in the geriatric population or those complicated with systemic disease, is still a challenge for regenerative medicine from the clinical perspective. The fast development of biomaterials and nanomedicine favors the emergence and promotion of efficient bone regeneration therapies. In this review, we briefly summarize the progress of novel biomaterial and nanomedical approaches to bone regeneration and then discuss the current challenges that still hinder their clinical applications in treating bone defects.

Indexed as

biomaterialsbone defectsnanomedicinescaffoldstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID37323213
PMCPMC10190996
OpenAlexW3208265643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.