ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2023
Drivers of Individual and Regional Variation in CMS Hierarchical Condition Categories Among Florida Beneficiaries.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk Adjustment in Medical Research: A Bird's Eye View.Journal of Korean medical science · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore hierarchical condition categories (HCC) risk score variation among Florida Fee for Service (FFS) Medicare beneficiaries between 2016 and 2018. Data Sources: This study analyzed HCC risk score variation using Medicare claims data for Florida beneficiaries enrolled in Parts A & B between 2016 and 2018. Study Design: The CMS methodology analyzed HCC risk score variation using annual mean county- and beneficiary-level risk score changes. The association between variation and beneficiary characteristics, diagnoses, and geographic location was characterized using mixed-effects negative binomial regression models. Data Collection: Not applicable. Principal Findings: Counties in the Northeast [marginal effect (ME)=-0.003], Central (ME=-0.021), and Southwest (ME=-0.009) Florida have relatively lower mean risk scores. A higher number of lifetime (ME=0.246) and treatable (ME=0.288) conditions were associated with higher county-level risk scores, while more preventable conditions (ME=-0.249) were associated with lower risk scores. Counties with older beneficiaries (ME=0.015) and more Blacks (ME=0.070) have higher risk scores, while having female beneficiaries reduced risk scores (ME=-0.005). Individual risk scores did not vary by age (ME=0.000), but Blacks (ME=0.001) had higher rates of variation relative to Whites, while other races had comparatively lower variation (ME=-0.003). In addition, individuals diagnosed with more lifetime (ME=0.129), treatable (ME=0.235), and preventable (ME=0.001) conditions had higher risk score variation. Most condition-specific indicators showed small associations with risk score changes; however, metastatic cancer/acute leukemia, respirator dependence/tracheostomy, and pressure ulcers of the skin were significantly associated with both types of HCC risk score variation. Conclusion: Results showed demographics, HCC condition classifications (ie, lifetime, preventable, and treatable), and some specific conditions were associated with higher variation in mean county-level and individual risk scores. Results suggest consistent coding and reductions in the prevalence of certain treatable or preventable conditions could reduce the county and individual HCC risk score year-to-year change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.