ArticleMedicine international
Aurora rings may not always indicate an inverted colonic diverticulum: Report of a rare case of colonic lipoma.
Article in Medicine international. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aurora rings are prominent endoscopic features of the inverted colonic diverticulum (ICD), and their appearance alongside a colonic lipoma is an unprecedented phenomenon. The present study reports a case of colonic lipoma with Aurora rings, contradicting the assumption that Aurora rings are indicative of ICD. A 52-year-old male patient presented with left-sided abdominal pain for >1 year, associated with constipation in the form of the decreased frequency of bowel motions every 4 to 5 days. A physical examination revealed an obese, protuberant abdomen and a mildly tender left iliac fossa region without other notable findings. A transabdominal ultrasonography revealed a thickening of the large bowel wall (<7 mm) with a suspected inflammatory lesion on the left side of the colon. During an ileocolonoscopy, multiple diffuse diverticula of various sizes were observed, affecting the entire colonic mucosa. Furthermore, a large (1.5 cm) pedunculated polyp with a thick stalk was found in the sigmoid colon, exhibiting positive Aurora rings. A polypectomy was conducted with the deployment of two hemoclips at the polyp base to prevent perforation. The histopathological examination of the specimen, a 1.3 cm polyp, revealed the presence of a colonic lipoma, rather than an ICD. The identification of Aurora rings has emerged as a significant endoscopic feature in the diagnosis of ICD; nevertheless, the underlying etiology of these rings remains elusive. Based on an extensive search of the literature, no study was found mentioning the appearance of Aurora rings in an endoscopic screening of other colonic conditions other than ICD. The appearance of Aurora rings alongside a colonic lipoma has not previously been mentioned, at least to the best of our knowledge, which renders the differentiation of ICD from lipomas and polyps more challenging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.