Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37323125›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2023

A CBT-based mobile intervention as an adjunct treatment for adolescents with symptoms of depression: a virtual randomized controlled feasibility trial.

Vera N Kulikov, Phoebe C Crosthwaite, Shana A Hall, Jessica E Flannery, Gabriel S Strauss, Elise M Vierra, Xin L Koepsell, Jessica I Lake, Aarthi Padmanabhan

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04524598 (Limbix Spark), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04524598 nacompletednot on this map

Limbix Spark: A CBT-based Mobile Intervention as First Line Treatment for Adolescent Depression During COVID-19

TypeinterventionalSponsorLimbix Health, Inc.Ran2020 to 2022Enrolled227ConditionsDepressionArmsLimbix Spark, Psychoeducation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vera N Kulikov *Research Department, Limbix Health, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Phoebe C Crosthwaite *Research Department, Limbix Health, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Shana A HallResearch Department, Limbix Health, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Jessica E FlanneryScience Department, Limbix Health, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Gabriel S StraussProduct Department, Limbix Health, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Elise M VierraContent Department, Limbix Health, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Xin L KoepsellContent Department, Limbix Health, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Jessica I LakeScience Department, Limbix Health, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Aarthi PadmanabhanResearch Department, Limbix Health, San Francisco, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: High rates of adolescent depression demand for more effective, accessible treatment options. A virtual randomized controlled trial was used to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a 5-week, self-guided, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)-based mobile application, Spark, compared to a psychoeducational mobile application (Active Control) as an adjunct treatment for adolescents with depression during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A community sample aged 13-21, with self-reported symptoms of depression, was recruited nationwide. Participants were randomly assigned to use either Spark or Active Control (N Results: 60 eligible adolescents (female = 47) were enrolled in 2 months. 35.6% of those expressing interest were consented and all enrolled. Study retention was high (85%). Spark users rated the app as usable (System Usability Scale Conclusion: Recruitment, enrollment, and retention rates demonstrated study feasibility by being comparable or better than other mental health apps. Spark was highly acceptable relative to published norms. The study's novel safety protocol efficiently detected and managed adverse events. The lack of significant difference in depression symptom reduction between Spark and Active Control may be explained by study design and study design factors. Procedures established during this feasibility study will be leveraged for subsequent powered clinical trials evaluating app efficacy and safety. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04524598.

Indexed as

adolescent depressioncognitive behavioral therapydigital therapeuticsfeasibilitymental healthmHealth

Identifiers

PMID37323125
PMCPMC10262850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.