SynthesisCancer medicine2023
Evaluation safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) and radiotherapy combination versus ICB in non-small cell lung cancer patients with recurrence or metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- WNT pathway inhibition sensitizes HAT1-high lung cancers to treatment with PD-1 inhibitors.Cancer cell international · 2025Article
- Investigating the Role of Lactate-Related Genes in Radiotherapy Resistance of Lung Cancer by Integrated Bioinformatics and Experiment Validation.Journal of Cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrently, immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) and radiotherapy (RT) combination therapy is broadly applied in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, meta-analysis about safety and efficacy of RT + ICB versus ICB has not yet been reported. To evaluate safety and efficacy of the combination therapy of ICB and RT in patients with recurrent or metastatic NSCLC and explore factors related to higher response rates, longer lifetime, and lower toxicity, meta-analysis of previous clinical data will be presented in this article.
methodsA literature search on patients with recurrent or metastatic NSCLC treated with RT + ICB versus ICB was performed using the Cochrane Library, Embase and PubMed up to December 10, 2022. Suitable quality assessment checklists were selected corresponding to various types of research studies. Comparative and single-arm studies were analyzed using Stata 14.0.
results10 comparative studies and 15 arms of combination therapy were included for this meta-analysis. RT significantly improved objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of ICB (I-square value (I
conclusionRT can significantly improve ORR, DCR, OS, and PFS of ICB in patients with recurrent or metastatic NSCLC without increasing toxicity. PD-1 inhibitor following SRS/SBRT could be the best option to maximally benefit the patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.