Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37322894›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2023

Pragmatic guidance for embedding pragmatic clinical trials in health plans: Large simple trials aren't so simple.

Noelle M Cocoros, Jerry H Gurwitz, Mark J Cziraky, Christopher B Granger, Thomas Harkins, Kevin Haynes, Xiaojuan Li, Lauren Parlett, John D Seeger, Sonal Singh and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Noelle M CocorosDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7090-2761
Jerry H GurwitzMeyers Health Care Institute, A Joint Endeavor of UMass Chan Medical School, Reliant Medical Group and Fallon Health, Worcester, MA, USA.
Mark J CzirakyHealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA.
Christopher B GrangerDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Thomas HarkinsHumana Healthcare Research, Inc., Louisville, KY, USA.
Kevin HaynesJanssen Research & Development, Titusville, PA, USA.
Xiaojuan LiDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Lauren ParlettHealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA.
John D SeegerOptum Epidemiology, Boston, MA, USA.
Sonal SinghMeyers Health Care Institute, A Joint Endeavor of UMass Chan Medical School, Reliant Medical Group and Fallon Health, Worcester, MA, USA.
Cheryl N McMahill-WalravenCVS Health Clinical Trial Services, Blue Bell, PA, USA.
Richard PlattDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory-Coordinating Center (U24)U24AT009676 · NCCIH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LESLEY H CURTIS, Adrian Hernandez · 2017 to 2026
$21.5M
HEAL Collaboratory Resource Coordinating Center (PRISM) (U24): Bioethics SupplementU24AT010961 · NCCIH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CURTIS, LESLEY H, HERNANDEZ, ADRIAN · 2019 to 2021
$6.4M
NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT009676NCCIH NIH HHS U24 AT010961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are unique opportunities related to the design and conduct of pragmatic trials embedded in health insurance plans, which have longitudinal data on member/patient demographics, dates of coverage, and reimbursed medical care, including prescription drug dispensings, vaccine administrations, behavioral healthcare encounters, and some laboratory results. Such trials can be large and efficient, using these data to identify trial-eligible patients and to ascertain outcomes.

methodsWe use our experience primarily with the National Institutes of Health Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory Distributed Research Network, which comprises health plans that participate in the US Food & Drug Administration's Sentinel System, to describe lessons learned from the conduct and planning of embedded pragmatic trials.

resultsInformation is available for research on more than 75 million people with commercial or Medicare Advantage health plans. We describe three studies that have used or plan to use the Network, as well as a single health plan study, from which we glean our lessons learned.

conclusionsStudies that are conducted in health plans provide much-needed evidence to drive clinically meaningful changes in care. However, there are many unique aspects of these trials that must be considered in the planning, implementation, and analytic phases. The type of trial best suited for studies embedded in health plans will be those that require large sample sizes, simple interventions that could be disseminated through health plans, and where data available to the health plan can be leveraged. These trials hold potential for substantial long-term impact on our ability to generate evidence to improve care and population health.

Indexed as

MedicareResearch DesignAgedHumansNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Pragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicSample SizeUnited Statesclaims dataDistributed Research NetworkPragmatic trialsreal-world data

Identifiers

PMID37322894
PMCPMC10363182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.