ArticleNursing open2023
Nurses' experience of integrating evidence-based changes into their practice: A qualitative study.
Article in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Nurses' Experiences and Perceptions of Evidence-Based Healthcare Competence: A Qualitative Systematic Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Pooled it
- The experiences of nurses in implementing clinical nursing research: a qualitative meta-synthesis.BMJ open · 2026Pooled it
- Facilitators and barriers to innovation and research capacity among clinical nurses: A qualitative systematic review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- The Measurement of Evidence-Based Healthcare Competence of Nurses and Associated Background Factors: A Scoping Review.Research in nursing & health · 2025Article
- Article
- Nurses' experiences and perspectives regarding evidence-based practice implementation in healthcare context: A qualitative study.Nursing open · 2024Article
- Nurses' experience of integrating evidence-based changes into their practice: A qualitative study.Nursing open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo explore the experiences of neonatal and NICU nurses on participating in evidence-based changes in their neonatal pain management practice.
designIt is a qualitative conventional content analysis.
methodsA purposive sample with nurses working in neonatal and NICUs was used. The data were collected through 11 semi-structured in-depth individual interviews, five focused group discussions, and observations and analyzed using the conventional content analysis method based on the Elo and Kyngäs model. The COREQ checklist was used for writing the report.
resultsAnalysis of gathered data led to the emergence of four themes, including 'being in a supportive and encouraging atmosphere', 'a journey from resistance to adherence', 'achieving multi-dimensional improvements', and 'facing obstructive challenges'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.