Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37322550›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2023

Immediate word recall in cognitive assessment can predict dementia using machine learning techniques.

Michael Adebisi Fayemiwo, Toluwase Ayobami Olowookere, Oluwabunmi Omobolanle Olaniyan, Theresa Omolayo Ojewumi, Idowu Sunday Oyetade, Shannon Freeman, Piper Jackson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Michael Adebisi FayemiwoDepartment of Computer Science, Redeemer's University, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria.
Toluwase Ayobami OlowookereDepartment of Computer Science, Redeemer's University, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria. olowookereta@run.edu.ng.
Oluwabunmi Omobolanle OlaniyanDepartment of Computer Science, Redeemer's University, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria.
Theresa Omolayo OjewumiDepartment of Computer Science, Redeemer's University, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria.
Idowu Sunday OyetadeDepartment of Computer Science, Redeemer's University, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria.
Shannon FreemanSchool of Nursing, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.
Piper JacksonDepartment of Computing Science, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada.
Redeemer's University · NGThompson Rivers University · CAUniversity of Northern British Columbia · CA

Funding

BC SUPPORT Unit Methods Cluster Project Award DaSHI-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDementia, one of the fastest-growing public health problems, is a cognitive disorder known to increase in prevalence as age increases. Several approaches had been used to predict dementia, especially in building machine learning (ML) models. However, previous research showed that most models developed had high accuracies, and they suffered from considerably low sensitivities. The authors discovered that the nature and the scope of the data used in this study had not been explored to predict dementia based on cognitive assessment using ML techniques. Therefore, we hypothesized that using word-recall cognitive features could help develop models for the prediction of dementia through ML techniques and emphasized assessing the models' sensitivity performance.

methodsNine distinct experiments were conducted to determine which responses from either sample person (SP)'s or proxy's responses in the "word-delay," "tell-words-you-can-recall," and "immediate-word-recall" tasks are essential in the prediction of dementia cases, and to what extent the combination of the SP's or proxy's responses can be helpful in the prediction of dementia. Four ML algorithms (K-nearest neighbors (KNN), decision tree, random forest, and artificial neural networks (ANN)) were used in all the experiments to build predictive models using data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS).

resultsIn the first scenario of experiments using "word-delay" cognitive assessment, the highest sensitivity (0.60) was obtained from combining the responses from both SP and proxies trained KNN, random forest, and ANN models. Also, in the second scenario of experiments using the "tell-words-you-can-recall" cognitive assessment, the highest sensitivity (0.60) was obtained by combining the responses from both SP and proxies trained KNN model. From the third set of experiments performed in this study on the use of "Word-recall" cognitive assessment, it was equally discovered that the use of combined responses from both SP and proxies trained models gave the highest sensitivity of 1.00 (as obtained from all the four models).

conclusionIt can be concluded that the combination of responses in a word recall task as obtained from the SP and proxies in the dementia study (based on the NHATS dataset) is clinically useful in predicting dementia cases. Also, the use of "word-delay" and "tell-words-you-can-recall" cannot reliably predict dementia as they resulted in poor performances in all the developed models, as shown in all the experiments. However, immediate-word recall is reliable in predicting dementia, as seen in all the experiments. This, therefore, shows the significance of immediate-word-recall cognitive assessment in predicting dementia and the efficiency of combining responses from both SP and proxies in the immediate-word-recall task.

Indexed as

Cognition DisordersCognitive DysfunctionDementiaCognitionHumansMachine LearningCognitive assessmentDementiaMachine learningMedical data analyticsWord recall

Identifiers

PMID37322550
PMCPMC10268524
OpenAlexW4380871419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.